General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]StevieM
(10,577 posts)But my point is that I don't think that it is historically correct to describe Hillary as someone who was seen as a shoe-in from 2005 through mid-2007. I think she went out on the campaign trail and built up a big lead. She earned it. And then she lost it.
But I don't like when people diminish her by acting like she had everything handed to her. She won over a lot of voters who had previously felt that they would never vote for her, at least not in a primary.
Like I said, this time around she has an enormous lead, one that completely dwarfs anything she had last time. That doesn't mean she can't lose it. Just that it is not the same situation as last time.
I agree that she will have an opponent, and I don't see that as a problem, nor do I think she sees that as a problem. My guess is that either O'Malley or Schweitzer or both will run against her.