Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: U.S. minorities on pace to be majority in months, not decades [View all]kwassa
(23,340 posts)7. It's all LBJ's fault. The change in immigration law.
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (Pub.L. 89236, 79 Stat. 911, enacted June 30, 1968), also known as the HartCeller Act,[1] abolished the National Origins Formula that had been in place in the United States since the Emergency Quota Act. It was proposed by Representative Emanuel Celler of New York, co-sponsored by Senator Philip Hart of Michigan, and promoted by Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts.
The Hart-Celler Act abolished the national origins quota system that was American immigration policy since the 1920s, replacing it with a preference system that focused on immigrants' skills and family relationships with citizens or U.S. residents. Numerical restrictions on visas were set at 170,000 per year, with a per-country-of-origin quota, not including immediate relatives of U.S. citizens, nor "special immigrants" (including those born in "independent" nations in the Western Hemisphere, former citizens, ministers, and employees of the U.S. government abroad).[1]
..............................................
The 1965 act marked a radical break from the immigration policies of the past. The law as it stood then excluded Asians and Africans and preferred northern and western Europeans over southern and eastern ones.[2] At the height of the civil rights movement of the 1960s the law was seen as an embarrassment by, among others, President John F. Kennedy, who called the then-quota-system "nearly intolerable".[3] After Kennedy's assassination, President Lyndon Johnson signed the bill at the foot of the Statue of Liberty as a symbolic gesture.
In order to convince the American people of the legislation's merits, its proponents assured that passage would not influence America's culture significantly. President Johnson called the bill "not a revolutionary bill. It does not affect the lives of millions",[4] while Secretary of State Dean Rusk estimated only a few thousand Indian immigrants over the next five years, and other politicians, including Senator Ted Kennedy, hastened to reassure the populace that the demographic mix would not be affected; these assertions would later prove grossly inaccurate.[5][
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It makes more sense that those married to minoities and those who have monority children,
bravenak
Jun 2014
#21
Yep. I would like to have them for myself and i think we can do better in our treatment of them.
bravenak
Jun 2014
#25
Yeah baby!!! I was happy to find an article from her, and even happier that she read my mind.nt
bravenak
Jun 2014
#32
And the lesson Republicans learned from the Cantor loss is to hate Mexicans even more.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jun 2014
#39
If people in his district see someone with a tan they freak that the Mexicans are taking over.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jun 2014
#56
This article is not whites vs. everyone else. And i am not the one who created the us vs them.
bravenak
Jun 2014
#50
The including of spouses of minorities and the inclusions of lgbt and their families is done
bravenak
Jun 2014
#76
They are a minority group with protected status in many states under hate crime laws.
bravenak
Jun 2014
#78
You are too much! At least you're funny, and i'm sorry, you are one of us now.
bravenak
Jun 2014
#57
I think he's pushed by the more brutish members of his party and that's why he's a wreck.
freshwest
Jun 2014
#69
And gerrymandering + low population states with equal representation in the senate means...
killbotfactory
Jun 2014
#68
KnR. Ah, the MSM...I think this must be the same kind of thinking that has them constantly....
Hekate
Jun 2014
#72
They need to do anything they can to hold on to power and shape the narrative.
bravenak
Jun 2014
#74