Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
35. That 50 state strategy didn't work in 2k, 2002, or 2004.
Thu Jun 12, 2014, 12:26 PM
Jun 2014

Democrats didn't win big, so why did it work in 2006? Because the Illegal wiretapping went on, Bush bungled Katrina. Congress had a new slew of scandals including the conviction and sentencing of "Duke" Cunningham.

In other words, the Rethugs appeared more incompetent and tone deaf to the public mood than the Democrats did. So the public mood to vote the bums out was running high. The Democrats made that their message, a responsible Congress was promised if you remember. In 2008, we had John McCain, who ran a far more inept campaign than anyone on our side had a right to hope. First he picked Palin, the darling of the RW set who was a moron. Then he refused to discuss any topic that wasn't somehow linked to the War on Terror because that was all that mattered. The Economic crash started in, and McCain said it was a blip, didn't matter, and he was still going to win the Presidency so he could keep fighting the War on Terror. Then he suddenly realized, about two weeks later while Senator Obama was continuing to discuss the impacts of the Economic crash, that the economy mattered. Then McCain rushes to Washington to show his Bi-Partisan chops, canceling the Debate, only to find nobody wanted to talk to him, Democrat or Republican. Then the debate was back on, and he was left looking out of touch, foolish, and self important.

Those misstep miracles happen, but you can't base your entire strategy on them.

Because that same fifty state strategy didn't save the House of Representatives for us in 2010. It didn't take the House back in 2012. We didn't win the majority of Governor's mansions, nor of State Legislatures. I'm sure someone had the numbers for the County Commissions, but I don't think we won a majority of those either.

This year, we're not going to take the House Back. That is all but impossible. The Rethugs would have to be caught red handed in a sex sting with children at this point. We can save the Senate majority, not to the level we have, but we can save the majority, if we are smart, and if we are willing to admit we're in a tough fight. Otherwise, President Obama's last two years are going to be spent in press conference after announcement that he's again using his Veto to stop the Rethugs from destroying the ACA, the Budget, the Federal Government, and the Nation. Immigration reform is already dead this year, and without holding the Senate, it's going to be dead next term too. Now, do you really want to set up the Presidential election with SOS Clinton explaining that she would have Vetoed all the legislation too? Because then people would have the image of more of the same not getting anything done as the message carried by the DNC Candidate.

In order to stop that, the Senate must remain as a Democratic Chamber, we have to hold the Senate. We have to put all the assets we have into that fight. We can't hold anything back.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Canter Gone, so is the Senate [View all] Savannahmann Jun 2014 OP
VA 7 is not as important as keeping the Senate and picking Dawson Leery Jun 2014 #1
Did you see the no toss up for Governor yeoman6987 Jun 2014 #2
Yes. elleng Jun 2014 #4
I doubt the Dem party will put much into VA 7, elleng Jun 2014 #3
Spot on elleng - n/t PumpkinAle Jun 2014 #5
Th DNC probably won't spend a lot of time on VA-7 DFW Jun 2014 #8
YES, YES, and YES! elleng Jun 2014 #9
Nailed it, as always! Cooley Hurd Jun 2014 #11
The DNC needs to spend a lot of time on Kay Hagan (NC) as well. (n/t) WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #19
Wendy Davis is one of the distractions I mentioned. Savannahmann Jun 2014 #23
The Senate isn't the only thing that matters. Ken Burch Jun 2014 #24
What would be worse? Savannahmann Jun 2014 #25
Nice try. Horse with no Name Jun 2014 #33
There aren't any polls that show Wendy winning. Savannahmann Jun 2014 #36
Morning Joe? LOL Horse with no Name Jun 2014 #37
The facts remain Savannahmann Jun 2014 #38
We shouldn't concede ANY seat, state or federal. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #26
Childers vs. McDaniel Aerows Jun 2014 #6
Aren't Democrats Winning? erpowers Jun 2014 #7
RCP is wrong. Begich is leading every Thug. Dawson Leery Jun 2014 #12
I feel fairly confident that Mark will win. Blue_In_AK Jun 2014 #13
Some of those are optimistic for the GOP. Chan790 Jun 2014 #10
I really do not understand your logic. ChairmanAgnostic Jun 2014 #14
So which is unlikely? Savannahmann Jun 2014 #17
Dean's 50 state strategy was great for 2006 and 2008 IronLionZion Jun 2014 #15
That 50 state strategy didn't work in 2k, 2002, or 2004. Savannahmann Jun 2014 #35
I prefer to wait until the votes are cast before conceding the Senate WI_DEM Jun 2014 #16
I agree. Savannahmann Jun 2014 #18
if Senate lost, will see the real Obama...unless we already have Leme Jun 2014 #20
I think we've been seeing him all along. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #27
that's close to my opinion Leme Jun 2014 #28
They're out for whatever headline du jour ... frazzled Jun 2014 #21
The Senate is gone , Obama already know this statementofgoods Jun 2014 #22
Name is spelled 'Cantor'. Are you under the impression that American elections are not always Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #29
My apologies on the typo Savannahmann Jun 2014 #30
Real Clear Politics? KamaAina Jun 2014 #31
How do you use poll numbers from all the organizations Savannahmann Jun 2014 #32
Yep. n/t Horse with no Name Jun 2014 #34
Doooooommmmmm. Gloooooooommmmmm. FSogol Jun 2014 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Canter Gone, so is the Se...»Reply #35