General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Snowden (who really does, apparently, have epilepsy) helps an epileptic. [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)because his familiarity with the symptoms enabled him to diagnose her condition remotely.
You didn't even read the OP, obviously. You apparently stopped at the title and didn't even wade through the snip, never mind hit the link.
And what you've missed is an opportunity to behave in a way that isn't disruptive, goading, baiting and obstructionist.
Why don't you spend your energies a bit more productively, I have to wonder? I mean, it's all very well and good that you keep kicking the thread for the evening crowd with your snarky and off-topic comments demanding that people here talk about something that is NOT the subject of the thread, but after awhile, that kind of behavior is regarded as "thread derailing"--like long, drawn out conversations about gardening or other unrelated topics might be--and if that kind of thing persists, people view it as deliberately disruptive and derailing.
Now surely, is that your intent? To harass people about a topic unrelated to the thread so they are unable to discuss the subject of the thread, which is Snowden's EPILEPSY and his diagnosis of a woman's epilepsy remotely?