Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Our Embassy in Baghdad is the Largest & Most Expensive in the World [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)20. Empires Architecture
Should it ever be finished, the U.S. embassy in Iraq will stand as a colossal monument to the Bush administrations failures
By Allen McDuffee
InTheseTimes.com,
Panic shot through the State Department and White House earlier this summer when the American architecture firm Berger Devine Yaeger posted computer-generated images and layout of the forthcoming U.S. embassy in Baghdad on its website. Ostensibly concerned with security, government officials urgently acted to remove graphics to avoid aiding potential insurgents in their plots to disrupt the embassys progress.
The real fear, however, may have been that the disclosure would draw public and congressional attention to everything thats gone wrong with the embassy. Indeed, its difficult to imagine how insurgents could be any more disruptive to the embassys existence than those who are building it. Allegations of mismanaged funds, shoddy workmanship, kickback schemes, exploitative labor practices, ill-gotten contracts, blocked investigations, trafficked humans and covered-up deaths have plagued the construction of the worlds largest embassy.
The planned 104-acre, 21-building compound on the Tigris River will include two office buildings, six apartment buildings, a pool, a gym, a movie theater and a food court. The embassy will be supported by its own power and water treatment plantsprobably wise in a country that has, on average, one hour to four hours of electricity daily, and where 70 percent of the population lacks clean drinking water.
The White House originally requested $1.3 billion to build the compound, but Congress allocated $592 million for the project in 2005. It was a hefty sum given that the United States didnt pay a cent to Iraq for the four-square-mile stretch of land in Baghdads Green Zone, roughly the size of Vatican City. By comparison, the United States paid $22 million for land that was less than one-tenth that size for a planned new embassy in Beirut, which will now no longer be built because of security concerns over its proximity to a Hezbollah stronghold.
Nevertheless, the nearly $600 million wasnt enough for the embassy in Iraq. According to documentation provided to Congress by the State Department, an additional $144 million is needed for completion and the embassy may cost as much as $1 billion each year to operate.
CONTINUED...
http://inthesetimes.com/article/3458/empires_architecture
By Allen McDuffee
InTheseTimes.com,
Panic shot through the State Department and White House earlier this summer when the American architecture firm Berger Devine Yaeger posted computer-generated images and layout of the forthcoming U.S. embassy in Baghdad on its website. Ostensibly concerned with security, government officials urgently acted to remove graphics to avoid aiding potential insurgents in their plots to disrupt the embassys progress.
The real fear, however, may have been that the disclosure would draw public and congressional attention to everything thats gone wrong with the embassy. Indeed, its difficult to imagine how insurgents could be any more disruptive to the embassys existence than those who are building it. Allegations of mismanaged funds, shoddy workmanship, kickback schemes, exploitative labor practices, ill-gotten contracts, blocked investigations, trafficked humans and covered-up deaths have plagued the construction of the worlds largest embassy.
The planned 104-acre, 21-building compound on the Tigris River will include two office buildings, six apartment buildings, a pool, a gym, a movie theater and a food court. The embassy will be supported by its own power and water treatment plantsprobably wise in a country that has, on average, one hour to four hours of electricity daily, and where 70 percent of the population lacks clean drinking water.
The White House originally requested $1.3 billion to build the compound, but Congress allocated $592 million for the project in 2005. It was a hefty sum given that the United States didnt pay a cent to Iraq for the four-square-mile stretch of land in Baghdads Green Zone, roughly the size of Vatican City. By comparison, the United States paid $22 million for land that was less than one-tenth that size for a planned new embassy in Beirut, which will now no longer be built because of security concerns over its proximity to a Hezbollah stronghold.
Nevertheless, the nearly $600 million wasnt enough for the embassy in Iraq. According to documentation provided to Congress by the State Department, an additional $144 million is needed for completion and the embassy may cost as much as $1 billion each year to operate.
CONTINUED...
http://inthesetimes.com/article/3458/empires_architecture
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Our Embassy in Baghdad is the Largest & Most Expensive in the World [View all]
Hissyspit
Jun 2014
OP
Mercs are still in Iraq, now hired by the Iraqi Government instead of the US.
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#10
We don't know how many mercs are there now. Apparently they've been flooding the country
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#21
Yes, that would be nice. And an apology to all who died. I doubt that will ever happen UNLESS
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#25
What is frightening was hearing McBlood calling for all of Obama's National Security team to resign
malaise
Jun 2014
#26
halliburton....it should never have been built. let's put bush cheney & rumsfeld there
spanone
Jun 2014
#16
We have money to throw away it appears. A few hundred million here, another billion there.
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#22
They destroyed all the beautiful buildings in Iraq so they could rob the American public as the
kelliekat44
Jun 2014
#24