Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: KRUGMAN: How big a deal is the surprise primary defeat of Representative Eric Cantor? VERY. [View all]1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)32. You know for tea-partiers ...
the "status quo" means something completely different from what a Democrat or liberal means when they say it, right?
The left of the party has been disenfranchised by the Democratic Party Machine. Our only hope is to get a serious progressive candidate to give H. Clinton a run for her Goldman-Sachs money.
Well, have at it ... then we will see whether the base of the party is in the left of the party, the right, or somewhere in the middle. I would hazard to guess, we are somewhere in the middle.
There are a lot of eligible voters that dont consider themselves in the Democratic base and they are sick of the status quo. These are the voters the Democrats should be trying to woo. Take a stand against Wall Street corruption, fix our infrastructure, vote down crippling trade agreements, repeal the Patriot Act, invest in the VA and not military buildups. H. Clinton isnt the one to take these on.
I would see a lot of eligible voters do not consider themselves in the Democratic base because there are not partisan. I agree that Democrats should woo them, but I doubt this cohort really cares about "taking a stand against Wall Street corruption, vote down crippling trade agreements, repeal the Patriot Act, or investing in the VA and not military buildups, other than a passing interest ... far, far after jobs and education and the social safety net and jobs.
It is only us semi-comfortable folks that have the time, energy and interest in the non-survival issues.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
KRUGMAN: How big a deal is the surprise primary defeat of Representative Eric Cantor? VERY. [View all]
kpete
Jun 2014
OP
The rejection of Cantor was a rejection of the "status quo". It was a rejection of the
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#3
There are a number of possible things that affected the vote including those that openly stated
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#27
I hope we both agree that Cantor was big time oligarch-run status quo. Cantor and his ilk
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#30
It's got to be a bit more about Cantor's arrogance with his own consituents.
SleeplessinSoCal
Jun 2014
#7
Our current crop of GOP/Tea Party shows what happens when crazy zealots get money
SoCalDem
Jun 2014
#15
Excellent assessment, Fred! Plus, this picture makes me want to turn around & check MY back!
NBachers
Jun 2014
#28
"Republicans mobilize voters with social issues, but invariably turn postelection to serving the 1%.
pampango
Jun 2014
#14
I hope he's right that it's bad news for the GOP...I really believe he's correct
joeybee12
Jun 2014
#20
All I know is that if I were the swordsman, I would have wondered why Jones was just standing there.
rocktivity
Jun 2014
#40
I've met a few Right Wingers that claim being pro gay marriage is one of THEIR issues....
Spitfire of ATJ
Jun 2014
#23