Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(65,258 posts)

6. It's such an obvious conflict of interest it would be funny it wasn't so tragic.

Fri Jun 13, 2014, 08:18 PM

Jun 2014

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #1

Occupy CNNFOXCBSMSNBC billhicks76 Jun 2014 #19

Agreed billhicks76 Jun 2014 #28

I kind of figured the smartest Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #2

Better to have a middleman, creates plausible deniability. Fred Sanders Jun 2014 #3

And only the jerks think that it is otherwise erronis Jun 2014 #13

Yes. elleng Jun 2014 #7

They bought the media ... GeorgeGist Jun 2014 #8

A side effect of this is... mindwalker_i Jun 2014 #9

And what better reason is there to mess with net neutrality? Skidmore Jun 2014 #10

Tired of all the pro-fracking ads on MSNBC. n/t NCarolinawoman Jun 2014 #11

An Excellent, And Often Overlooked Point, Sir The Magistrate Jun 2014 #12

PBS? (nt) Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #16

It's a racket. nt bemildred Jun 2014 #17

Those with the most money have the most speech neverforget Jun 2014 #18

it pays to be rich neverforget Jun 2014 #23

^^^we have a winner^^ mopinko Jun 2014 #21

been wondering that very thing for years ellennelle Jun 2014 #24

The extreme right wing polynomial Jun 2014 #25

K&R. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #26

Filthy lucre, filthy speech Blue Owl Jun 2014 #29