Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Australians don't have a Right to keep and bear arms. GeorgeGist Jun 2014 #1
Or enforce the well-regulated militia part. mattclearing Jun 2014 #7
The meaning of the phrase "well-regulated" Keefer Jun 2014 #28
Pretty sure most gun nuts fail this test. n/t mattclearing Jun 2014 #43
The 2A is not stopping strict gun regulation - time to drop that myth. hack89 Jun 2014 #14
That is not true. former9thward Jun 2014 #25
So that part would be unconstitutional hack89 Jun 2014 #40
Maybe not, but gun owners, NRA, etc., are. When are you guys gonna push for Hoyt Jun 2014 #27
Never hack89 Jun 2014 #41
Lucky Australians treestar Jun 2014 #36
There must be another way then repeal yeoman6987 Jun 2014 #51
Repealing the second amendment wouldn't make the right go away. X_Digger Jun 2014 #63
I think your link is FUBARed aikoaiko Jun 2014 #2
Fixed, TY! doxydad Jun 2014 #4
Gun bans are, in my mind, are violations of the 2nd amendment. aikoaiko Jun 2014 #3
perhaps not a violation if made within the context of 2A - you know, well-regulated militia and all DrDan Jun 2014 #5
yes, the militia administration can ban the use of arms in their militias, aikoaiko Jun 2014 #8
so our founding fathers, in their wisdom, thought we should arm folks like this DrDan Jun 2014 #16
Look like what exactly? What features are you attending to? aikoaiko Jun 2014 #18
then again, we could more intelligently form the militia, and provide/allow arms to those DrDan Jun 2014 #19
I doubt that was what they intended. aikoaiko Jun 2014 #21
I don't DrDan Jun 2014 #22
Yes, they did. former9thward Jun 2014 #26
when it comes to faith in a militia, I shall put my confidence in the "average colonialist" DrDan Jun 2014 #31
Whatever that means... former9thward Jun 2014 #33
I think you can figure it out - I have faith DrDan Jun 2014 #34
What is wrong with him? yeoman6987 Jun 2014 #54
never said that, did I? . . . but good try DrDan Jun 2014 #60
Start the conversation then... doxydad Jun 2014 #6
Improving the NICS list and making it available to private sellers would help a lot. aikoaiko Jun 2014 #9
I'll throw this out to anyone: Why isn't NICS open to all? Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #10
Yes, as if it's all metadata and nothing could go wrong HereSince1628 Jun 2014 #20
If I want to buy a shotgun from you, and agree voluntarily Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #23
There's also "delayed". VScott Jun 2014 #24
I understand, but the resulting hassle is no worse... Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #38
exactly, everyone on the list can be assumed to be a criminal HereSince1628 Jun 2014 #35
I'm still mystified as to what the legal, privacy, or bureaucratic problem Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #39
We are writing past each other from different points of view HereSince1628 Jun 2014 #44
I think I see what you are saying. I suppose a private seller Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #45
My concern isn't trivial bandying about of information but rather HereSince1628 Jun 2014 #48
By now, I'm sure the NSA has algorithms in place... Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #49
then let's amend the amendment spanone Jun 2014 #12
Depends on the proposed revision. aikoaiko Jun 2014 #13
Yes. Maybe we could add the words "well regulated". Crunchy Frog Jun 2014 #30
The 2A is not stopping the strict regulation of guns hack89 Jun 2014 #42
I wish. Arugula Latte Jun 2014 #11
Besides absolutely no public support for them? nt hack89 Jun 2014 #15
Americans don't want it. What's so hard to understand about that? LittleBlue Jun 2014 #17
Are they crazy? After all those massacres, why wouldn't Americans want gun laws like ours? Violet_Crumble Jun 2014 #29
It's sentimentality and not logic LittleBlue Jun 2014 #37
LittleBlue has it. Supporters have romantic visions of themselves as a hero with a gun stopping stevenleser Jun 2014 #58
They just don't love freedumb the way we do. n/t Crunchy Frog Jun 2014 #32
Australia is not America. dilby Jun 2014 #46
I don't give two shits for the constitution.... Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #47
"take whatever measures:" Hence, guns. Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #50
You can use the writers of the Patriot Act as your advisors hack89 Jun 2014 #52
They lied.... Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #61
The 2A is not stopping strict gun control hack89 Jun 2014 #65
Well lets just ditch every law or inititiave after the original writer dies. dilby Jun 2014 #53
Yes. Exactly. Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #62
Do you think what present voters think? hack89 Jun 2014 #55
Wow! yeoman6987 Jun 2014 #56
Well yes, but Australians Turbineguy Jun 2014 #57
If you want to avoid the 2nd, don't restrict guns, but license people who should have guns... Sancho Jun 2014 #59
mostly because our representatives are as a group a bunch of Doctor_J Jun 2014 #64
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why not here? Australia's...»Reply #34