Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WaPo: U.S. Officials Scrambled to Nab Snowden ("Decision to Force a Foreign Leader’s Plane to Land") [View all]ucrdem
(15,720 posts)53. "We'll update if this changes." Apparently it hasn't.
This latest looks to be wishful revisionism.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
140 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
WaPo: U.S. Officials Scrambled to Nab Snowden ("Decision to Force a Foreign Leader’s Plane to Land") [View all]
Hissyspit
Jun 2014
OP
The "flight plan" map, thank you for posting it, it's clearly due to crab turbulence
Dragonfli
Jun 2014
#111
Did Miller actually provide any new evidence on the Morales plane story?
struggle4progress
Jun 2014
#34
In link, in the statement in the article under discussion in the WaPo, leads
struggle4progress
Jun 2014
#49
''Snowden faces federal charges and is therefore regarded as a fugitive abroad...''
Whisp
Jun 2014
#132
All the denials that the US had anything to do with the reprehensible treatment of
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#133
Hey, they have been getting away with this "plausible deniability" stuff for a long time now.
bemildred
Jun 2014
#140
Wow, so Snowden outsmarted the White House, Homeland security, the FBI, and the CIA
quinnox
Jun 2014
#6
Posted This In Another Thread... In Case You're Interested... Rendition Aircraft...
WillyT
Jun 2014
#35
naw, it's just the WH being overenthusiastic in undoing what Bush did. or something
MisterP
Jun 2014
#29
It seems to have been the best link Greg Miller could find for his claim
struggle4progress
Jun 2014
#39
We should judge the article on it's actual content, not merely on the fact it appeared in WaPo
struggle4progress
Jun 2014
#110
It's disgraceful how certain parts of the government lie and mislead the public with impunity.
BlueCheese
Jun 2014
#55
I think the new article in the Washingotn post explains why this has come up again.
Vattel
Jun 2014
#79
I think it is ridiculous that anyone here thinks they know what actually happened.
djean111
Jun 2014
#102