Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WaPo: U.S. Officials Scrambled to Nab Snowden ("Decision to Force a Foreign Leader’s Plane to Land") [View all]Hissyspit
(45,790 posts)73. You are reading the article incorrectly.
He is saying this has been discussed with him by anonymous U.S. official/s:
The best play for us is him landing in a third country, Monaco said, according to an official who met with her at the White House. The official, who like other current and former officials interviewed for this article discussed internal deliberations on the condition of anonymity, added, We were hoping he was going to be stupid enough to get on some kind of airplane, and then have an ally say: Youre in our airspace. Land.
U.S. officials thought they saw such an opening on July 2 when Bolivian President Evo Morales, who expressed support for Snowden, left Moscow aboard his presidential aircraft. The decision to divert that plane ended in embarrassment when it was searched in Vienna and Snowden was not aboard.
- snip -
The burst of activity during that period including the White House meetings, a broad diplomatic scramble and the decision to force a foreign leaders plane to land was far more extensive than U.S. officials acknowledged at the time.
U.S. officials thought they saw such an opening on July 2 when Bolivian President Evo Morales, who expressed support for Snowden, left Moscow aboard his presidential aircraft. The decision to divert that plane ended in embarrassment when it was searched in Vienna and Snowden was not aboard.
- snip -
The burst of activity during that period including the White House meetings, a broad diplomatic scramble and the decision to force a foreign leaders plane to land was far more extensive than U.S. officials acknowledged at the time.
It may well still be false and the article is confusing the way it is written, but he is not just using the hyperlink as evidence.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
140 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
WaPo: U.S. Officials Scrambled to Nab Snowden ("Decision to Force a Foreign Leader’s Plane to Land") [View all]
Hissyspit
Jun 2014
OP
The "flight plan" map, thank you for posting it, it's clearly due to crab turbulence
Dragonfli
Jun 2014
#111
Did Miller actually provide any new evidence on the Morales plane story?
struggle4progress
Jun 2014
#34
In link, in the statement in the article under discussion in the WaPo, leads
struggle4progress
Jun 2014
#49
''Snowden faces federal charges and is therefore regarded as a fugitive abroad...''
Whisp
Jun 2014
#132
All the denials that the US had anything to do with the reprehensible treatment of
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#133
Hey, they have been getting away with this "plausible deniability" stuff for a long time now.
bemildred
Jun 2014
#140
Wow, so Snowden outsmarted the White House, Homeland security, the FBI, and the CIA
quinnox
Jun 2014
#6
Posted This In Another Thread... In Case You're Interested... Rendition Aircraft...
WillyT
Jun 2014
#35
naw, it's just the WH being overenthusiastic in undoing what Bush did. or something
MisterP
Jun 2014
#29
It seems to have been the best link Greg Miller could find for his claim
struggle4progress
Jun 2014
#39
We should judge the article on it's actual content, not merely on the fact it appeared in WaPo
struggle4progress
Jun 2014
#110
It's disgraceful how certain parts of the government lie and mislead the public with impunity.
BlueCheese
Jun 2014
#55
I think the new article in the Washingotn post explains why this has come up again.
Vattel
Jun 2014
#79
I think it is ridiculous that anyone here thinks they know what actually happened.
djean111
Jun 2014
#102