Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Contrast pre-Iraq war views of Bob Graham and the Clintons. We need to remember. [View all]
The archived Palm Beach Post is unavailable, but I saved the important pages. Here's the original link from 2004. It was a long article:
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/content/news/epaper/2004/09/11/a6a_graham_0911.html/
Here is what I saved from it. I have posted it before, but he deserves much credit for his stance.
Graham: "frankly, my friends. ... the blood's going to be on your hands."
..."On Oct. 9, 2002, Graham the guy everyone thought of as quiet, mild-mannered, deliberate, conflict-averse let loose on his Senate colleagues for going along with President Bush's war against Iraq.
"We are locking down on the principle that we have one evil, Saddam Hussein. He is an enormous, gargantuan force, and that's who we're going to go after," Graham said on the floor. "That, frankly, is an erroneous reading of the world. There are many evils out there, a number of which are substantially more competent, particularly in their ability to attack Americans here at home, than Iraq is likely to be in the foreseeable future."
He told his fellow senators that if they didn't recognize that going to war with Iraq without first taking out the actual terrorists would endanger Americans, "then, frankly, my friends to use a blunt term the blood's going to be on your hands."
It was a watershed moment. Gone was the meticulous thinker who would talk completely around and through a problem before answering a question about it...
From CNN 2004 the words of Bill Clinton:
Clinton defends successor's push for war
"I have repeatedly defended President Bush against the left on Iraq, even though I think he should have waited until the U.N. inspections were over," Clinton said in a Time magazine interview that will hit newsstands Monday, a day before the publication of his book "My Life."
Clinton, who was interviewed Thursday, said he did not believe that Bush went to war in Iraq over oil or for imperialist reasons but out of a genuine belief that large quantities of weapons of mass destruction remained unaccounted for.
"I want it to have been worth it, even though I didn't agree with the timing of the attack," Clinton said.
It wasn't worth it.
And some powerful quotes from Hillary Clinton which make it hard to believe her apology now. From ABC news 2008:
Hillary and the Iraqi People
"Around the world we have to restore American leadership and our moral authority and that begins by ending the war in Iraq and bringing our troops home," Clinton said, per ABC News Eloise Harper. "I know that we can starting within 60 days have a plan to begin responsibly and safely withdrawing our young men and women.
"And I believe that at the same time that we have to make clear to the Iraqis that they have been given the greatest gift that a human being can give another human being the gift of freedom. And it is up to them to decide how they will use that precious gift that has been paid for with the blood and sacrifice and treasure of the United States of America.
"And it is time for the Iraqis to demonstrate that they understand that there is no military solution American troops can not stay there, contrary to my friend John McCain who is suggesting they be there 50 to 100 years. No they are going to start coming home if I am president within 60 days and they will keep coming home."
I doubt the Iraqis are feeling very enthusiastic about all that freedom now.
I remember all the posts here before the invasion about what would happen once we were there. Most of the thoughts here were that it would descend into chaos.
I think we were right on that.
I do not think President Obama has been left with good options at this time. He's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't jump in.
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Contrast pre-Iraq war views of Bob Graham and the Clintons. We need to remember. [View all]
madfloridian
Jun 2014
OP
it remains to be seen which will recover first - this country from reagan or the dem party from the
KG
Jun 2014
#1
She is shameless. and contemptible and Clinton engages in raw historical revisionism.
cali
Jun 2014
#2
how are you going to vote for her if she wins the Primary while speaking the heinous stuff
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#13
I opine. You call it "spewing"- which is fine. Your opinion is worth little to me.
cali
Jun 2014
#17
you don't opine....you spew vile hatred of the woman day in and day out....
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#61
you're accusing her of revisionism using a mix of charges from a right wing source
bigtree
Jun 2014
#36
no. I pointing to your reliance on a well-known republican sympathizer for your 'facts'
bigtree
Jun 2014
#56
Let me help you out on Dick Morris and his lack of credibility toward the Clintons.
madfloridian
Jun 2014
#73
it's not a shame, it's was inevitable. no enterprise based on such craven deceit could ever
KG
Jun 2014
#6
In October 2002 Bob Graham begged fellow senators to read the "entire" NIE on WMDs.
madfloridian
Jun 2014
#5
This country does field serious candidates for the presidency that can unequivocally
A Simple Game
Jun 2014
#16
Kucinich never made it through the primaries, I am unaffiliated so don't consider
A Simple Game
Jun 2014
#65
"When did we become a nation that ignores and berates our friends and calls them irrelevant?"
KeepItReal
Jun 2014
#11
That's why I have credibility in recognizing the same kind of adoration now.
madfloridian
Jun 2014
#44
No, that is actually a materially different (though arguably a potentially equally stupid) position
TheKentuckian
Jun 2014
#42
Invading someone's country, killing and torturing their people, destroying their country AND
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#28
that line about a lock isn't mine - but she's got a good start for the nomination
bigtree
Jun 2014
#34
the last quotes were fine. They referred to Iraqis taking responsibility for their own security
bigtree
Jun 2014
#31
This was a vote that affected all of us, affected the world's stability, our country's reputation.
madfloridian
Jun 2014
#49
She voted for the war because it was expedient. She apologized for her vote for the same reason.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2014
#50
And neva forget it; the last thing we need is anotha warmonger in the White House (biggest reason we chose Obama over Hillary).
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2014
#76
When it comes to the Clintons, I really don't know what they believe...
Drunken Irishman
Jun 2014
#51
GTFO IS a good option. Then, help America lead by example, not violence. If we can ever lead again.
grahamhgreen
Jun 2014
#68