Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
Sun Jun 15, 2014, 07:28 AM Jun 2014

Contrast pre-Iraq war views of Bob Graham and the Clintons. We need to remember. [View all]

The archived Palm Beach Post is unavailable, but I saved the important pages. Here's the original link from 2004. It was a long article:

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/content/news/epaper/2004/09/11/a6a_graham_0911.html/

Here is what I saved from it. I have posted it before, but he deserves much credit for his stance.

Graham: "frankly, my friends. ... the blood's going to be on your hands."

..."On Oct. 9, 2002, Graham — the guy everyone thought of as quiet, mild-mannered, deliberate, conflict-averse — let loose on his Senate colleagues for going along with President Bush's war against Iraq.

"We are locking down on the principle that we have one evil, Saddam Hussein. He is an enormous, gargantuan force, and that's who we're going to go after," Graham said on the floor. "That, frankly, is an erroneous reading of the world. There are many evils out there, a number of which are substantially more competent, particularly in their ability to attack Americans here at home, than Iraq is likely to be in the foreseeable future."

He told his fellow senators that if they didn't recognize that going to war with Iraq without first taking out the actual terrorists would endanger Americans, "then, frankly, my friends — to use a blunt term — the blood's going to be on your hands."

It was a watershed moment. Gone was the meticulous thinker who would talk completely around and through a problem before answering a question about it...


From CNN 2004 the words of Bill Clinton:

Clinton defends successor's push for war

"I have repeatedly defended President Bush against the left on Iraq, even though I think he should have waited until the U.N. inspections were over," Clinton said in a Time magazine interview that will hit newsstands Monday, a day before the publication of his book "My Life."

Clinton, who was interviewed Thursday, said he did not believe that Bush went to war in Iraq over oil or for imperialist reasons but out of a genuine belief that large quantities of weapons of mass destruction remained unaccounted for.

"I want it to have been worth it, even though I didn't agree with the timing of the attack," Clinton said.


It wasn't worth it.

And some powerful quotes from Hillary Clinton which make it hard to believe her apology now. From ABC news 2008:

Hillary and the Iraqi People

"Around the world we have to restore American leadership and our moral authority and that begins by ending the war in Iraq and bringing our troops home," Clinton said, per ABC News’ Eloise Harper. "I know that we can starting within 60 days have a plan to begin responsibly and safely withdrawing our young men and women.

"And I believe that at the same time that we have to make clear to the Iraqis that they have been given the greatest gift that a human being can give another human being – the gift of freedom. And it is up to them to decide how they will use that precious gift that has been paid for with the blood and sacrifice and treasure of the United States of America.

"And it is time for the Iraqis to demonstrate that they understand that there is no military solution — American troops can not stay there, contrary to my friend John McCain who is suggesting they be there 50 to 100 years. No they are going to start coming home if I am president within 60 days and they will keep coming home."


I doubt the Iraqis are feeling very enthusiastic about all that freedom now.

I remember all the posts here before the invasion about what would happen once we were there. Most of the thoughts here were that it would descend into chaos.

I think we were right on that.

I do not think President Obama has been left with good options at this time. He's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't jump in.

77 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
it remains to be seen which will recover first - this country from reagan or the dem party from the KG Jun 2014 #1
She is shameless. and contemptible and Clinton engages in raw historical revisionism. cali Jun 2014 #2
how are you going to vote for her if she wins the Primary while speaking the heinous stuff VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #13
I opine. You call it "spewing"- which is fine. Your opinion is worth little to me. cali Jun 2014 #17
you don't opine....you spew vile hatred of the woman day in and day out.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #61
Shameless you say? Let's look at the evidence. A Simple Game Jun 2014 #20
"Historical revisionism" is a generous description of her many "Misspeaks" Divernan Jun 2014 #30
you're accusing her of revisionism using a mix of charges from a right wing source bigtree Jun 2014 #36
You resort to name calling when you cannot refute a single charge. Hmmmmm. Divernan Jun 2014 #53
no. I pointing to your reliance on a well-known republican sympathizer for your 'facts' bigtree Jun 2014 #56
And that's because you can't refute a single instance. Sad. Divernan Jun 2014 #58
no. It's because you're promoting right-wing bullshit bigtree Jun 2014 #59
Dude, nobody needs to refute any claim by Dick Morris MohRokTah Jun 2014 #63
Let me help you out on Dick Morris and his lack of credibility toward the Clintons. madfloridian Jun 2014 #73
I agree with you on Dick Morris as a source. madfloridian Jun 2014 #67
in the history biz it's called MisterP Jun 2014 #46
that has its origins in holocaust denial bigtree Jun 2014 #52
Not I rock Jun 2014 #64
won't you please tell us how you really feel. WhiteTara Jun 2014 #70
It's a shame that it turned out the way it did. Turbineguy Jun 2014 #3
It's a crime that the U.S. invaded Iraq under false pretenses cali Jun 2014 #4
It was yes. Turbineguy Jun 2014 #7
it's not a shame, it's was inevitable. no enterprise based on such craven deceit could ever KG Jun 2014 #6
I take a less fatalistic view. Turbineguy Jun 2014 #9
The Iraqi people are victims. madfloridian Jun 2014 #10
In October 2002 Bob Graham begged fellow senators to read the "entire" NIE on WMDs. madfloridian Jun 2014 #5
Graham should be the one on the Sunday morning shows. Justice Jun 2014 #22
Can't help but think, based tom_kelly Jun 2014 #23
Are you serious - what an idiot. Justice Jun 2014 #24
It boggles my mind that this country Vattel Jun 2014 #8
This country does field serious candidates for the presidency that can unequivocally A Simple Game Jun 2014 #16
Fair enough, I guess it depends on how you define serious. Vattel Jun 2014 #26
You don't have to look to the minor parties. Jim Lane Jun 2014 #45
Kucinich never made it through the primaries, I am unaffiliated so don't consider A Simple Game Jun 2014 #65
I already answered your question. Jim Lane Jun 2014 #69
"When did we become a nation that ignores and berates our friends and calls them irrelevant?" KeepItReal Jun 2014 #11
I was just watching the last one. madfloridian Jun 2014 #40
Kerry on Iraq ctsnowman Jun 2014 #12
From the OP 90-percent Jun 2014 #14
Well then... madfloridian Jun 2014 #15
I will not vote for Hillary. Katashi_itto Jun 2014 #18
Pretty similar to Howard Dean's position back in the day, huh? wyldwolf Jun 2014 #19
No, not really. madfloridian Jun 2014 #41
yeah, I must have missed it. wyldwolf Jun 2014 #43
That's why I have credibility in recognizing the same kind of adoration now. madfloridian Jun 2014 #44
Well, looks like Dean has taken his twitter private. madfloridian Jun 2014 #74
No, that is actually a materially different (though arguably a potentially equally stupid) position TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #42
"Freedom" for whom, exactly. To do *what*, exactly? Smarmie Doofus Jun 2014 #21
Did we save the receipt Union Scribe Jun 2014 #25
If you're damned if you do and damned if you don't... Iggo Jun 2014 #27
Invading someone's country, killing and torturing their people, destroying their country AND sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #28
I don't know any Democrats personally who will vote for Hillary Oilwellian Jun 2014 #29
I know plenty of Democrats personally who like Hillary a lot bigtree Jun 2014 #32
If DU's an echo chamber & HRC has a lock on the nomination, why are you here? Divernan Jun 2014 #33
that line about a lock isn't mine - but she's got a good start for the nomination bigtree Jun 2014 #34
I explicitly explained why I perceived your statement as disparaging. Divernan Jun 2014 #35
I'll call it volatile, just so you can move on. bigtree Jun 2014 #39
"Volatile" is also disparaging. You really need to use a dictionary! Divernan Jun 2014 #57
I suppose it is. I stand by the word. bigtree Jun 2014 #60
Clinton got 17.5 million votes in 2008 wyldwolf Jun 2014 #47
the last quotes were fine. They referred to Iraqis taking responsibility for their own security bigtree Jun 2014 #31
I did not have to "strain" to find differences. They were very real. madfloridian Jun 2014 #37
it's a stretch to look for differences in her desire to end the occupation bigtree Jun 2014 #38
Hard to believe an apology? joshcryer Jun 2014 #48
This was a vote that affected all of us, affected the world's stability, our country's reputation. madfloridian Jun 2014 #49
She voted for the war because it was expedient. She apologized for her vote for the same reason. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2014 #50
And neva forget it; the last thing we need is anotha warmonger in the White House (biggest reason we chose Obama over Hillary). InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #76
When it comes to the Clintons, I really don't know what they believe... Drunken Irishman Jun 2014 #51
Some of us remember the same story (believe it or not) about Vietnam! Sancho Jun 2014 #54
Oh, no! madfloridian Jun 2014 #55
Bill Clinton should have known better. moondust Jun 2014 #62
President Obama is certainly damned if he does. Enthusiast Jun 2014 #66
GTFO IS a good option. Then, help America lead by example, not violence. If we can ever lead again. grahamhgreen Jun 2014 #68
Kick FloriTexan Jun 2014 #71
Thanks. madfloridian Jun 2014 #72
I wonder if Bill Clinton has seen the Rachel Maddow documentary? Hissyspit Jun 2014 #75
That statement was hard to believe. madfloridian Jun 2014 #77
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Contrast pre-Iraq war vie...