Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warpy

(114,636 posts)
31. ...and to have as little as possible to do with their offspring
Sun Jun 15, 2014, 07:59 PM
Jun 2014

The nanny delivers them at convenient times, dressed, bathed and on their best behavior around emotionally distant parents. Once a school will take them, they're whisked off to be raised by emotionally distant teachers and hostile schoolmates.

They have no experience of unconditional acceptance, let alone love, so their relationships are likely to be quite distant and businesslike, also.

What I find hilarious is that their parents are often in politics on the side that criticizes mothers for going out to work and abandoning their offspring to day care.

That a lot of the offspring of the wealthy turn out to be sociopathic should come as no surprise.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R treestar Jun 2014 #1
du rec. xchrom Jun 2014 #2
I was going to argue against this... Chan790 Jun 2014 #3
FDR went to boarding school. Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #4
He also had polio. sulphurdunn Jun 2014 #7
It hit him in 1921, when he was 39 years old. JHB Jun 2014 #18
He also had Eleanor. Downwinder Jun 2014 #23
Some general exceptions probably apply Bibliovore Jun 2014 #5
Boarding School damage Legender75 Jun 2014 #6
of course. You were 5. cali Jun 2014 #10
The article in the OP is about sending young children to boarding school. Gormy Cuss Jun 2014 #16
the article title does NOT say that it's about young children and most people cali Jun 2014 #22
Subtitle: "The elite tradition is to send children away at a young age to be educated." csziggy Jun 2014 #28
Surely you read beyond the title before responding. Gormy Cuss Jun 2014 #29
Thanks for sharing your insight Kber Jun 2014 #17
Emotionally damaged, parentally rejected children grow to be bad leaders? Generic Brad Jun 2014 #8
sure- if you send a kid away at age 7 to 12 or 14, but beyond that? cali Jun 2014 #9
Not to mention the smaller boys get raped a lot. AngryAmish Jun 2014 #11
Welcome to DU, Legender 75 ~ Love that old time wisdom toby jo Jun 2014 #12
Interesting. Romney and Bush also seem to spooky3 Jun 2014 #13
JFK went to Choate cali Jun 2014 #14
There are always exceptions and statistically, spooky3 Jun 2014 #19
uh, how do you know these are the exceptions. it's nonsense to make that claim cali Jun 2014 #20
The author has been studying and working with spooky3 Jun 2014 #24
yes, children who are sent away to school at a very young age. not the same thing as cali Jun 2014 #30
John Kennedy, Franklin Roosevelt and John Kerry went to boarding schools. former9thward Jun 2014 #15
K&R woo me with science Jun 2014 #21
The true problem is the idea that the wealthy and privileged are born to rule BrotherIvan Jun 2014 #25
...and to have as little as possible to do with their offspring Warpy Jun 2014 #31
I think there is a huge difference between a 7 year old being sent off pnwmom Jun 2014 #26
Exactly. The article and the documentry linked- which I watched as well, detail the vanlassie Jun 2014 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why boarding schools prod...»Reply #31