General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]bigtree
(94,701 posts). . . in that un-sourced MJ article? Don't expect rational people to sign on to an uncorroborated tale that hasn't been verified in all of the years since the accusation first surfaced in 2007.
You're still vibing all of that innuendo and smear off of a 2007 article which hasn't been verified or been backed up by anything corroborating the charges against Clinton.
People correctly point to the transgressions of some participants in the public prayer sessions, but there's NOTHING more about Clinton's supposed involvement with the group outside of the public prayers which has surfaced to back up the claims about her own involvement.
NOTHING since 2007. That's a pretty damning stretch of time. Surely someone would find something other than the claims of a MJ reporter to prove she's involved in something nefarious, secret, or destructive.