Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What exactly constitutes an acceptable human being around here? [View all]La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)58. i think the handicap comment was unwarranted but i do think that to prefer a politician whose
most important book is the constitution and not the bible , is a perfectly acceptable position to take.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
160 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
quite a distortion of reality you are presenting. This is a forum for an exchange of ideas. Some
lostincalifornia
Jun 2014
#3
can you state an example on DU where racism was allowed, without getting hidden or tombstones?
lostincalifornia
Jun 2014
#53
The example you state sure is, in addition to being a broad brush generalization. I am actually
lostincalifornia
Jun 2014
#101
Wow, this really should not be tolerated. Maybe the jury system is not so good after all and we
lostincalifornia
Jun 2014
#108
I sure haven't seen it here on DU without it eventually getting hidden
lostincalifornia
Jun 2014
#100
Perhaps you should spend less time lurking at Free Rupublic. It will warp your mind.
Jack Rabbit
Jun 2014
#7
You all need to check out Democrats for Progress. It's right up there in terms of serious.
Autumn
Jun 2014
#20
i'm not convinced any of you are human. i think this is all one big turing test.
unblock
Jun 2014
#13
Of course, there's probably just as much thinly veiled homophobia as thinly veiled racism on DU -
nomorenomore08
Jun 2014
#137
umm i think plenty of people on DU are religious and tolerant of religiousity
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#23
On religion: the threads about Clinton's mention of the Bible suggest otherwise
BainsBane
Jun 2014
#48
i think the handicap comment was unwarranted but i do think that to prefer a politician whose
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#58
"What else am I missing?" Anyone who gets panty wadded from taking DU discussion personally?
yellowcanine
Jun 2014
#24
That was the one line I found questionable, as much for the word choice as anything.
nomorenomore08
Jun 2014
#139
Queen Clarice...hmmmm...has a certain ring to it..I would be glad to alternate days with you. lol
clarice
Jun 2014
#148
I have nothing against Elizabeth Warren. Nothing at all. She seems like a great politiican.
Tommy_Carcetti
Jun 2014
#143
Awww. I encourage those who hate DU or find it disturbing to move on to other web forums.
quinnox
Jun 2014
#70
No one will always agree with you all the time. And even if they did, that forum would be beyond
quinnox
Jun 2014
#73
But certainly one of the faultlines of debate has to be what is acceptable to post at DU
el_bryanto
Jun 2014
#89
Am I right in thinking that you're disagreeing with some of the "standards" found on DU?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2014
#91
But when a sockpuppet has been here for a great length of time, does it cease to be a sock...
bluesbassman
Jun 2014
#97
They must herp to the irresistable beat of the all perperful derpitude.
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2014
#125