Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I think a Hillary Clinton - Elizabeth Warren ticket would be unbeatable. [View all]VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)54. I can give you several
http://www.ontheissues.org/hillary_clinton.htm
Starting with....
Hillary Clinton on Free Trade
Have a trade prosecutor to enforce the trade agreements. (Feb 2008)
AdWatch: Supported NAFTA in 1998; opposed CAFTA since 2005. (Jan 2008)
Criticized trade pacts for weak labor standards. (Nov 2007)
FactCheck: for NAFTA while First Lady; now against CAFTA. (Oct 2007)
Export from big agribusiness, but also from small farmers. (Aug 2007)
Smart, pro-American trade: NAFTA has hurt workers. (Aug 2007)
No fast-track authority for this president. (Aug 2007)
Better approach: real trade adjustment assistance. (Aug 2007)
End tax breaks for outsourcing jobs. (Jun 2007)
Defended outsourcing of US jobs to India. (Oct 2005)
Globalization should not substitute for humanization. (Jun 1999)
Supports MFN for China, despite concerns over human rights. (Oct 2000)
Voting Record
Though Bill supported it, Hillary opposed NAFTA. (Oct 2007)
Voted against CAFTA despite Bill Clintons pushing NAFTA. (Oct 2005)
Voted YES on free trade agreement with Oman. (Jun 2006)
Voted NO on implementing CAFTA for Central America free-trade. (Jul 2005)
Voted YES on establishing free trade between US & Singapore. (Jul 2003)
Voted YES on establishing free trade between the US and Chile. (Jul 2003)
Voted NO on extending free trade to Andean nations. (May 2002)
Voted YES on granting normal trade relations status to Vietnam. (Oct 2001)
Voted YES on removing common goods from national security export rules. (Sep 2001)
Build a rule-based global trading system. (Aug 2000)
Rated 17% by CATO, indicating a pro-fair trade voting record. (Dec 2002)
Extend trade restrictions on Burma to promote democracy. (Jun 2007)
Starting with....
Hillary Clinton on Free Trade
Have a trade prosecutor to enforce the trade agreements. (Feb 2008)
AdWatch: Supported NAFTA in 1998; opposed CAFTA since 2005. (Jan 2008)
Criticized trade pacts for weak labor standards. (Nov 2007)
FactCheck: for NAFTA while First Lady; now against CAFTA. (Oct 2007)
Export from big agribusiness, but also from small farmers. (Aug 2007)
Smart, pro-American trade: NAFTA has hurt workers. (Aug 2007)
No fast-track authority for this president. (Aug 2007)
Better approach: real trade adjustment assistance. (Aug 2007)
End tax breaks for outsourcing jobs. (Jun 2007)
Defended outsourcing of US jobs to India. (Oct 2005)
Globalization should not substitute for humanization. (Jun 1999)
Supports MFN for China, despite concerns over human rights. (Oct 2000)
Voting Record
Though Bill supported it, Hillary opposed NAFTA. (Oct 2007)
Voted against CAFTA despite Bill Clintons pushing NAFTA. (Oct 2005)
Voted YES on free trade agreement with Oman. (Jun 2006)
Voted NO on implementing CAFTA for Central America free-trade. (Jul 2005)
Voted YES on establishing free trade between US & Singapore. (Jul 2003)
Voted YES on establishing free trade between the US and Chile. (Jul 2003)
Voted NO on extending free trade to Andean nations. (May 2002)
Voted YES on granting normal trade relations status to Vietnam. (Oct 2001)
Voted YES on removing common goods from national security export rules. (Sep 2001)
Build a rule-based global trading system. (Aug 2000)
Rated 17% by CATO, indicating a pro-fair trade voting record. (Dec 2002)
Extend trade restrictions on Burma to promote democracy. (Jun 2007)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think a Hillary Clinton - Elizabeth Warren ticket would be unbeatable. [View all]
Viva_Daddy
Jun 2014
OP
Put those names in reverse positions and it most certainly would be doable...n/t
monmouth3
Jun 2014
#1
I KNOW thats one.....HRC would never go along and EW would never suggest it
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#13
Actually, EW already said she would not run for President, so yes, it appears you are right, it is a
lostincalifornia
Jun 2014
#61
Actually that would play well in a lot of the Southern states including Florida
lostincalifornia
Jun 2014
#63
No candidacy is unbeatable. I thought Kerry was unbeatable in 2004... Decorated War Vet
berni_mccoy
Jun 2014
#6
so you admit you wont vote for the winner of the Democratic Primary if it is HRC?
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#19
I'll vote for the most progressive, anti-war, candidate on the ballot.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2014
#20
it was a yes or no question will you vote for HRC if she wins the primary?
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#22
Get with the program. Not liking Hillary has been labeled as admonishing her supporters.
djean111
Jun 2014
#33
finger wagging at fellow Democrats demanding that those that support her just shut up!
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#39
TPP. TPP. Oh, and when there were primaries with Obama and Hillary, I guess the term was used
djean111
Jun 2014
#53
Cantor is an ideologue. Ask him what? How many times Obama are should be appealed?
TheKentuckian
Jun 2014
#82
lol. the irony is rich..... as you run up and down this thread wagging, wagging away
cali
Jun 2014
#73
Perfect example of nit-picking. I do not think Hillary supporters really want anyone else to
djean111
Jun 2014
#43
Because NO OTHER candidate can boast that they can beat ANY Republican in the polls....
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#51
So all the early hoo-hah and pushback against people who do not prefer Hillary for president is
djean111
Jun 2014
#57
Who said I didn't want a primary? That was projection from the ideologues...
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#59
yes, indeed. the abject adoration squad calls anyone opposed to St. Hill of the Corporations
cali
Jun 2014
#77
You were clearly disparaging Logical for his/her tough stand while also doing the same. nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#45
No the difference is NO ONE is disparaging Elizabeth Warren or any other Democratic candidate....
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#47
Are you saying that you will be willing to back any Democrat for president in 2016?
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#60
Because she's a Democrat and four years of Republican rule would be unbearable.
Louisiana1976
Jun 2014
#29
Two women on the ticket would be the ultimate GOTV motivator for the GOP/Teahadists.
Atman
Jun 2014
#32
This is a bad idea. Sen Warren is too important to relegate to the role of VP.
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#37
don't underestimate the sexism that exists in this country. As long as women get out and vote, you
lostincalifornia
Jun 2014
#58