General Discussion

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)

86. I'll make that decision in 2016 (nt)

Reply to lostincalifornia (Reply #65)

Tue Jun 17, 2014, 11:45 AM

Jun 2014

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

87 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I think a Hillary Clinton - Elizabeth Warren ticket would be unbeatable. [View all] Viva_Daddy Jun 2014 OP

Put those names in reverse positions and it most certainly would be doable...n/t monmouth3 Jun 2014 #1

no that would never happen other than your fantasies VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #2

You have no idea of what my fantasies are...LOL...n/t monmouth3 Jun 2014 #10

I KNOW thats one.....HRC would never go along and EW would never suggest it VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #13

Actually, EW already said she would not run for President, so yes, it appears you are right, it is a lostincalifornia Jun 2014 #61

AND she already put her support behind HRC....so yeah...fantasyland. VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #64

Yup lostincalifornia Jun 2014 #72

She did not put her support behind Hillary Mnpaul Jun 2014 #76

In Texas, we would love a Clinton/Castro ticket Gothmog Jun 2014 #3

In California we would love a Clinton/Castro ticket or a Warren/Castro ticket... Tikki Jun 2014 #7

I like them a lot, but I don't think the Castros have enough experience Rstrstx Jun 2014 #35

That's the one I was hoping for... Bring Texas back into the light. freshwest Jun 2014 #15

Either one would be awesome! JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #26

Actually that would play well in a lot of the Southern states including Florida lostincalifornia Jun 2014 #63

I could send big bucks to that ticket. nt onehandle Jun 2014 #4

well at least massachusetts would be in the bag.... unblock Jun 2014 #5

No candidacy is unbeatable. I thought Kerry was unbeatable in 2004... Decorated War Vet berni_mccoy Jun 2014 #6

'Twould indeed be tough to beat. Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2014 #8

Good idea. Just might turn Texas blue. Louisiana1976 Jun 2014 #28

Clinton and a rotting piece of fruit would be unbeatable. n/t Orsino Jun 2014 #9

even with a ham sandwich! VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #16

No way will the ticket be two women. The key word is "balance". Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #11

its called defense. Put someone in at VP they will hate even more VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #17

A "man's man" LOL. I can't even say that with a straight face.... bettyellen Jun 2014 #87

I would hate to see Sen Warren's voice stifled like that Marrah_G Jun 2014 #12

and VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #18

I dont see much stopping her opinions MFM008 Jun 2014 #30

Take the Hillary part out and it would get my vote. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2014 #14

so you admit you wont vote for the winner of the Democratic Primary if it is HRC? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #19

I'll vote for the most progressive, anti-war, candidate on the ballot. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2014 #20

it was a yes or no question will you vote for HRC if she wins the primary? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #22

I'm not wagging my finger at anyone. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2014 #24

"No Hillary" is my motto! I will hold my nose (and money) and vote for.... Logical Jun 2014 #21

then stop being a hypocrite admonishing those that DO support her... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #23

When did I do that? Which post are you talking about? nt Logical Jun 2014 #25

Get with the program. Not liking Hillary has been labeled as admonishing her supporters. djean111 Jun 2014 #33

finger wagging at fellow Democrats demanding that those that support her just shut up! VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #39

I think that finger-wagging is mostly from the Hillary side. djean111 Jun 2014 #42

Hillary I remind you is pilloried here...on a DEMOCRATIC FORUM.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #44

Her policies are pilloried. I am sure is she is a lovely person. djean111 Jun 2014 #46

bullfuckingshit! She even had her religion thrown in her face... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #48

And....last but not least...Hillary Clinton on Free Trade VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #50

Worked on the TPP. Helped draft the TPP. Endorses the TPP. djean111 Jun 2014 #66

proof please.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #67

Oh just google Hillary TPP. djean111 Jun 2014 #70

Yet Elizabeth Warren still supports her..... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #71

..... cali Jun 2014 #74

The facts speak for themselves.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #49

TPP. TPP. Oh, and when there were primaries with Obama and Hillary, I guess the term was used djean111 Jun 2014 #53

Keep reading my posts....I answered that too....who knew indeed! VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #55

You were saying? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #56

Cantor is an ideologue. Ask him what? How many times Obama are should be appealed? TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #82

Answer my question, when did I do that?? n-t Logical Jun 2014 #62

really, don't bother cali Jun 2014 #75

OK, makes sense now. Thanks!! n-t Logical Jun 2014 #79

lol. the irony is rich..... as you run up and down this thread wagging, wagging away cali Jun 2014 #73

"looks like they don't want her primaried".. VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #40

Perfect example of nit-picking. I do not think Hillary supporters really want anyone else to djean111 Jun 2014 #43

Because NO OTHER candidate can boast that they can beat ANY Republican in the polls.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #51

So all the early hoo-hah and pushback against people who do not prefer Hillary for president is djean111 Jun 2014 #57

Who said I didn't want a primary? That was projection from the ideologues... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #59

Oooh - the trifecta! djean111 Jun 2014 #68

Hell yeah you damn skippy! VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #69

yes, indeed. the abject adoration squad calls anyone opposed to St. Hill of the Corporations cali Jun 2014 #77

Projection. rhett o rick Jun 2014 #34

Projection of WHAT? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #41

You were clearly disparaging Logical for his/her tough stand while also doing the same. nm rhett o rick Jun 2014 #45

No the difference is NO ONE is disparaging Elizabeth Warren or any other Democratic candidate.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #47

Are you saying that you will be willing to back any Democrat for president in 2016? rhett o rick Jun 2014 #60

When did I do that? Are you just lying or have a link?? n-t Logical Jun 2014 #81

This message was self-deleted by its author Adam051188 Jun 2014 #27

Because she's a Democrat and four years of Republican rule would be unbearable. Louisiana1976 Jun 2014 #29

This message was self-deleted by its author Adam051188 Jun 2014 #31

How easily some can be manipulated. Happy with 20 lashes instead of 30. rhett o rick Jun 2014 #36

That is not a reason in the primary. I pray she does not make it. n-t Logical Jun 2014 #85

I can give you several VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #54

She is one of the architects of the TPP. Period. cali Jun 2014 #78

hahahahaha...right VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #80

Two women on the ticket would be the ultimate GOTV motivator for the GOP/Teahadists. Atman Jun 2014 #32

This is a bad idea. Sen Warren is too important to relegate to the role of VP. rhett o rick Jun 2014 #37

She's never said she's not running for Vice President! KamaAina Jun 2014 #38

No, thanks. bigwillq Jun 2014 #52

Are you voting against her if she wins the primary? lostincalifornia Jun 2014 #65

I'll make that decision in 2016 (nt) bigwillq Jun 2014 #86

don't underestimate the sexism that exists in this country. As long as women get out and vote, you lostincalifornia Jun 2014 #58

no HRC! n/t wildbilln864 Jun 2014 #83

If Hillary Clinton is going to win, she Le Taz Hot Jun 2014 #84