Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
5. Tricky issue for Democratic candidates. Unions on one side, environmentalists on the other.
Tue Jun 17, 2014, 12:45 PM
Jun 2014

Angering Environmentalists, AFL-CIO Pushes Fossil-Fuel Investment

Labor’s Richard Trumka has gone on record praising the Keystone pipeline and natural gas export terminals.

The nation’s leading environmental groups are digging their heels in the sand by rejecting President Obama’s “all-of-the above” domestic energy strategy—which calls for pursuing renewable energy sources like wind and solar, but simultaneously expanding oil and gas production.

But it appears the AFL-CIO, the nation’s largest labor federation, won’t be taking environmentalists’ side in this fight, despite moves toward labor-environmentalist cooperation in recent years. On a recent conference call with reporters, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka endorsed two initiatives reviled by green groups: the Keystone XL pipeline and new natural gas export terminals.

“There’s no environmental reason that [the pipeline] can’t be done safely while at the same time creating jobs,” said Trumka.

http://inthesetimes.com/article/16221/angering_environmentalists_afl_cio_pushes_fossil_fuel_investme

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Rachel Maddow Says Politico Is ‘Effectively’ The Romney Campaign’s ‘Campaign Newsletter’ onehandle Jun 2014 #1
So did Hillary answer the question or not? n/t sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #3
How dare you not chase off in the deflected direction! Iggo Jun 2014 #6
The old 'look over there' routine never worked on me, since I was around five or so. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #7
Why can't she respond? It seems like a simple enough question. THIS is why we need to let sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #2
that shouldn't be allowed to stand bigtree Jun 2014 #4
Tricky issue for Democratic candidates. Unions on one side, environmentalists on the other. Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #5
I don't see any 'tickiness' at all. When something is wrong it's wrong, period. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #10
Whoops.... "trickiness". Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #12
Perhaps we should be developing alternative energy, which is GOING TO HAPPEN anyhow sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #13
Is it really an axiom that our country must allow the transport of toxic materials Dragonfli Jun 2014 #16
Hear, hear! Canada can build their OWN pipelines and refineries on CANADIAN soil. HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #18
Is this an issue which will be resolved before the election time? Thinkingabout Jun 2014 #8
Politico did a pretty bad job explaining her reasons. WaPo did much better Demit Jun 2014 #9
Did she answer the question or not? Does she support it or not? That is all we want to know. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #11
Why don't you read the link for yourself? Demit Jun 2014 #23
Completely reasonable political position -- ie not taking a position on a hot potato issue karynnj Jun 2014 #17
Her fingerprints are all over Keystone tularetom Jun 2014 #14
Yup, Hillary can run, but won't be able to hide forever on this issue. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #30
Hedging her bets, but could that hurt her this time? karynnj Jun 2014 #15
She will keep silent, until, as many others, the issue will suite her agenda. mylye2222 Jun 2014 #26
Will she be "no comment" on TPP also? HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #19
Hillary Clinton On Her Personal View On Keystone XL: "I Can't Respond" - WP Ichingcarpenter Jun 2014 #20
LOL! Sheldon Cooper Jun 2014 #21
Hillary is a known commodity n2doc Jun 2014 #22
She'll have to check with her handlers and the polls to see where she stands. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2014 #24
"You might very well think that; I couldn't possibly comment" MisterP Jun 2014 #25
Such bravery! LittleBlue Jun 2014 #27
Does our current President have a clear position on the pipeline? NCTraveler Jun 2014 #28
Obama is the one in the hot seat because his own State Department put him there tularetom Jun 2014 #31
I like that answer. joshcryer Jun 2014 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Of course. Hillary Clint...»Reply #5