Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

frylock

(34,825 posts)
48. the responsible gun owner that had their responsible gun stolen after failing to secure it..
Tue Jun 17, 2014, 11:51 AM
Jun 2014

may share some culpability.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"The United States accounts for nearly 75 percent of all children murdered in the developed world. DrDan Jun 2014 #1
That last paragraph is both depressing and unsurprising. The NRA is definitely killing our children. LonePirate Jun 2014 #7
So when some gangster shoots another gangster Boom Sound 416 Jun 2014 #10
Seriously? That sounds like another excuse to not do anything to reduce gun violence. gtar100 Jun 2014 #17
Where do I argue against regulation? Boom Sound 416 Jun 2014 #20
Nice derail intaglio Jun 2014 #21
My argument is not against regulation Boom Sound 416 Jun 2014 #25
Yeah, and the moon is made of green cheese n/t intaglio Jun 2014 #28
Wow. Boom Sound 416 Jun 2014 #29
so, show us all the pro regulation posts you've put up here at DU CreekDog Jun 2014 #51
Awwww Boom Sound 416 Jun 2014 #52
those instances are probably counted on both sides of the issue, don't you think? DrDan Jun 2014 #24
I think I understand your point Boom Sound 416 Jun 2014 #26
the responsible gun owner that had their responsible gun stolen after failing to secure it.. frylock Jun 2014 #48
Maybe. That's true. Boom Sound 416 Jun 2014 #49
there you go, post away on this topic CreekDog Jun 2014 #50
This message was self-deleted by its author Skittles Jun 2014 #77
Do they mean murdered or killed? Scratchem Jun 2014 #2
Dead is dead. Is the terminology really that important. Arkansas Granny Jun 2014 #9
If dead is dead, then let's go after the real problem metalbot Jun 2014 #19
So you are saying that better swimming pool control is not the answer to swimming pool deaths? intaglio Jun 2014 #23
Swimming pool control LiberalLovinLug Jun 2014 #35
So 18 and 19 year old adult criminals blueridge3210 Jun 2014 #33
Any evidence these children are "adult criminals"? intaglio Jun 2014 #36
More evidence than they are "children". blueridge3210 Jun 2014 #38
So edit your post intaglio Jun 2014 #39
18 and 19 are "adults", not "adolescents". blueridge3210 Jun 2014 #41
In your world intaglio Jun 2014 #42
In any world 18 and 19 are adults not adolescents. blueridge3210 Jun 2014 #44
The ad hom was saying they were all criminals intaglio Jun 2014 #45
Never said they were all criminals. blueridge3210 Jun 2014 #46
Quote from the title of your post intaglio Jun 2014 #47
No, that is just poor reading comprehension on your part. ManiacJoe Jun 2014 #69
No your implication was clear and deliberate intaglio Jun 2014 #70
Well, not MY implication. ManiacJoe Jun 2014 #71
But it was the characterisation criminal I was objecting to intaglio Jun 2014 #78
That would bring us back to your misreading of the post #33. ManiacJoe Jun 2014 #79
Stop lying, that was not the wording used intaglio Jun 2014 #80
And now you have misread my post #79. ManiacJoe Jun 2014 #81
Nope. Nice try but nope intaglio Jun 2014 #82
Since you are the only one confused by this, ManiacJoe Jun 2014 #83
Did you read the article? I don't see any mention of 18 and 19 year old adult criminals. Arkansas Granny Jun 2014 #37
I read "kids aged 0-19" blueridge3210 Jun 2014 #43
I think I'll go with the medical and CDC research rather than a biased, non-sourced editorial. LanternWaste Jun 2014 #57
I'm not sure I understand the significance of the relationship between ... Scratchem Jun 2014 #61
I don't suspect it makes much difference but I presume they mean killed. Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #11
as long as the numbers are counted equitably on both sides . . . DrDan Jun 2014 #27
WTF? Scruffy Rumbler Jun 2014 #30
What's the actual question? Scratchem Jun 2014 #34
WTF is the difference ... the loss of life due to guns is the issue etherealtruth Jun 2014 #72
Is there any other groups that have a message for children pipoman Jun 2014 #3
yeah it is just like that dsc Jun 2014 #4
The point is, the US isn't going to amend the constitution pipoman Jun 2014 #12
You don't need to amend the constitution. CSStrowbridge Jun 2014 #15
It makes good sense to prohibit violent ex-felons and those legally adjudged ... spin Jun 2014 #32
What are you talking about? CSStrowbridge Jun 2014 #60
There are few reliable statistics on defensive gun uses but firearms are often used ... spin Jun 2014 #66
you do realize Investor's Business Daily is a hell of a lot more right wing than the WSJ right? nt alp227 Jun 2014 #68
I understand the "shoot the messenger" tactic but the fact remains that the main stream ... spin Jun 2014 #74
How do you stop ex-felons from owning guns? Jenoch Jun 2014 #40
Universal background checks. CSStrowbridge Jun 2014 #59
Opening NICS to private sellers is something even pro-2A advocates would agree to. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2014 #63
I am in favor of a UBC law. Jenoch Jun 2014 #65
What new group are you suggesting should be prohibited? pipoman Jun 2014 #56
There is no "fire in a crowded theater" amendment. What makes you think reasonable, Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #18
Years of studying the issue and the case law around it.. pipoman Jun 2014 #55
Jeez. Are you saying gun fetishists have a sexual attraction to their guns? Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2014 #13
I'm saying that control fanatics are as dumb as their ideas pipoman Jun 2014 #54
How's this... CSStrowbridge Jun 2014 #14
As soon as the same is applied to everything pipoman Jun 2014 #53
If you have no clue what the constitution says... CSStrowbridge Jun 2014 #58
Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #62
If you can't take time to study the volumes of established pipoman Jun 2014 #64
Yet another terrible hide, above. beevul Jun 2014 #73
It has been this way since I've been on du... pipoman Jun 2014 #76
Arguing about guns is pointless, hell, right here on DU you have gun fanatics randys1 Jun 2014 #5
If people are dying that could be solved with gun control legislation. .. pipoman Jun 2014 #67
Children clearly have an anti-Second Amendment bias. onehandle Jun 2014 #6
Because you see malaise Jun 2014 #8
i believe the nra kills children samsingh Jun 2014 #16
Kick! Heidi Jun 2014 #22
xchrom Diclotican Jun 2014 #31
Who gives a 5 year old a .22 rifle? flvegan Jun 2014 #75
Exactly. Guns are not toys. ManiacJoe Jun 2014 #84
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Guns Kill Children The ov...»Reply #48