Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Rachel Maddow Says Politico Is ‘Effectively’ The Romney Campaign’s ‘Campaign Newsletter’ onehandle Jun 2014 #1
So did Hillary answer the question or not? n/t sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #3
How dare you not chase off in the deflected direction! Iggo Jun 2014 #6
The old 'look over there' routine never worked on me, since I was around five or so. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #7
Why can't she respond? It seems like a simple enough question. THIS is why we need to let sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #2
that shouldn't be allowed to stand bigtree Jun 2014 #4
Tricky issue for Democratic candidates. Unions on one side, environmentalists on the other. Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #5
I don't see any 'tickiness' at all. When something is wrong it's wrong, period. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #10
Whoops.... "trickiness". Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #12
Perhaps we should be developing alternative energy, which is GOING TO HAPPEN anyhow sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #13
Is it really an axiom that our country must allow the transport of toxic materials Dragonfli Jun 2014 #16
Hear, hear! Canada can build their OWN pipelines and refineries on CANADIAN soil. HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #18
Is this an issue which will be resolved before the election time? Thinkingabout Jun 2014 #8
Politico did a pretty bad job explaining her reasons. WaPo did much better Demit Jun 2014 #9
Did she answer the question or not? Does she support it or not? That is all we want to know. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #11
Why don't you read the link for yourself? Demit Jun 2014 #23
Completely reasonable political position -- ie not taking a position on a hot potato issue karynnj Jun 2014 #17
Her fingerprints are all over Keystone tularetom Jun 2014 #14
Yup, Hillary can run, but won't be able to hide forever on this issue. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #30
Hedging her bets, but could that hurt her this time? karynnj Jun 2014 #15
She will keep silent, until, as many others, the issue will suite her agenda. mylye2222 Jun 2014 #26
Will she be "no comment" on TPP also? HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #19
Hillary Clinton On Her Personal View On Keystone XL: "I Can't Respond" - WP Ichingcarpenter Jun 2014 #20
LOL! Sheldon Cooper Jun 2014 #21
Hillary is a known commodity n2doc Jun 2014 #22
She'll have to check with her handlers and the polls to see where she stands. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2014 #24
"You might very well think that; I couldn't possibly comment" MisterP Jun 2014 #25
Such bravery! LittleBlue Jun 2014 #27
Does our current President have a clear position on the pipeline? NCTraveler Jun 2014 #28
Obama is the one in the hot seat because his own State Department put him there tularetom Jun 2014 #31
I like that answer. joshcryer Jun 2014 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Of course. Hillary Clint...»Reply #30