Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
Tue Jun 17, 2014, 07:38 PM Jun 2014

Dominionism: This is what is at the heart of any discussion of "the Family" and Michael Coe [View all]

At the apex of hard Dominionism is the religious dogma of Dominion Theology, with two major branches: Christian Reconstructionism and Kingdom Now theology. It is the latter's influence on the theopolitical movement called the New Apostolic Reformation that has been linked in published reports to potential Republican presidential nominees Perry, Bachmann or Palin. All three of these right-wing political debutantes have flirted with Christian Right Dominionism, but how far they have danced toward the influence of hard-right Dominion Theology is in dispute. It would be nice if some "mainstream" journalists actually researched the question.

"While differing from Reconstructionism in many ways, Kingdom Now shares the belief that Christians have a mandate to take dominion over every area of life," explains religion scholar Bruce Barron. And it is just this tendency that has spread through evangelical Protestantism, resulting in the emergence of "various brands of `dominionist' thinkers in contemporary American evangelicalism," according to Barron.

The most militant Dominion Theologists would silence dissenters and execute adulterers, homosexuals and recalcitrant children. No...seriously. OK, they would only be executed for repeated offenses, explain some defenders of Christian Reconstructionism. Even most Christian Right activists view the more militant Dominion Theologists as having really creepy ideas.


http://www.publiceye.org/christian_right/dominionism.htm


And this is why when the story exploded all over the National Media that Hillary Clinton joined the prayer group in Congress, it is a major deal, Here from the Atlantic.

Today, on Capitol Hill, as the old avenues of bipartisanship have gradually been blocked off by hardening ideology, the prayer groups have become cherished sanctuaries for their members—providing respite, however brief, from the cacophony of political Washington. Speaking about a group is strongly discouraged, and what transpires at meetings is strictly off the record. As a result, the groups provide an intimate setting in which members can share their faith without fear of being judged. “Once you take off the cloak of politics and look into a person’s soul, you find that you can establish a relationship that is enduring and deep and doesn’t let politics get in the way,” one longtime participant explained to me. “If you’re going to be consistent with the teachings of Jesus, it’s about forgiveness, reconciliation, and peace.” Many who come, he said, are surprised to wind up forming close friendships with colleagues who in any other setting would be considered political enemies.

You’re not supposed to think about lofty spiritual affairs in terms so temporal as their political importance. But among the prayer groups, one holds special status: a tight-knit gathering of about a dozen senators which still meets every Wednesday morning for prayer and discussion, led by Douglas Coe himself. Each week, someone starts the meeting by giving personal testimony, secure in the support of the audience. Once, Senator Dan Coats stood before the group and sang “Jesus Loves Me, This I Know.”

The roster of regular participants has included such notable conservative names as Brownback, Santorum, Nickles, Enzi, and Inhofe. Then, in 2001, just after the new class of senators was sworn in, another name was added to the list: Hillary Rodham Clinton.


http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2006/11/take-two-hillarys-choice/305292/

Mrs Clinton also had glowing words about Mr. Coe in her own autobiography. This is not an attack. This is a fact. One that exploded in 2008. And if she should decide to run for office, that is a fact that people need to take into account. Dominionism is about power, not necessarily religion.
55 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How many threads will it take before this sinks in around here? Jackpine Radical Jun 2014 #1
Well right now it is because we have a few people here talking nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #2
When she denounces it...completely, unequivically. ret5hd Jun 2014 #3
Feb. 31, 2015. Trust me. That's the date. ChairmanAgnostic Jun 2014 #26
K&R Katashi_itto Jun 2014 #4
Thanks sis nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #7
Sis? Katashi_itto Jun 2014 #8
Hey we can see some of us as a sisterhood of sorts nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #9
True! Katashi_itto Jun 2014 #12
I do not believe that HRC is "7 Mountains" and you don't either....this is just to the point of VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #5
Same smear as it was here: sufrommich Jun 2014 #6
"Barack Obama = Stealth Christian Dominionist?" All that and a secret Muslim too. What a busy boy... Hekate Jun 2014 #24
don't forget jay-z and beyonce hopemountain Jun 2014 #37
It was a non issue in 2008. joshcryer Jun 2014 #10
Informed voters will use the info nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #11
I'm just saying it barely hit the news. joshcryer Jun 2014 #13
So I go back to the well informed voter, don't I? nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #14
I'm with you on this, Unknown Beatle Jun 2014 #22
I am hoping that her newborn grand-baby nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #23
There certainly have been a lot of grandfathers in the Oval Office.... Hekate Jun 2014 #25
Just a.heartbreak. That is all.NT 7wo7rees Jun 2014 #15
I think she's smart enough to tell reality from fantasy rickyhall Jun 2014 #16
This is about power nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #17
As if her being 3rd way wasn't bad enough. Phlem Jun 2014 #20
Please let a real candidate show up.... glinda Jun 2014 #18
I confess, I was sucked into the religion drama but Phlem Jun 2014 #19
You welcome. part of it, like when covering my local fires, is knowing nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #21
K&R DeSwiss Jun 2014 #27
And I am looking at a whole list of them, not just Hillary nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #28
I get that point, and agree.... DeSwiss Jun 2014 #31
I don't know if Clinton is a Dominionist, but I do know Dominionism is real and they do want to DesertDiamond Jun 2014 #29
We all must take these yahoos seriously nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #30
Thank You For Sharing cantbeserious Jun 2014 #32
Its hard for me to imagine the mind that is both Liberal and a Dominionist. peoli Jun 2014 #33
Think of a VENN diagram, the nexus is power. nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #36
Maybe she will usher in the second coming of Christ... peoli Jun 2014 #38
As it should terrify any right thinking person nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #40
I can see that Venn Diagram. joshcryer Jun 2014 #39
Wrong analogy nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #41
That wouldn't matter to the Venn Diagram, imo. joshcryer Jun 2014 #43
Yes, and she is also part of the top cell nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #44
The biggest takeaway from Sharlet's book is Clinton is for social justice. joshcryer Jun 2014 #46
I have been involved in Social Justice nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #47
I think I have a much more optimistic view than that. joshcryer Jun 2014 #48
Climate change is one of the reasons we are moving where we are moving nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #49
I understand where you're coming from, and I'm very glad you said that. Raksha Jun 2014 #53
I looked into this two years ago. What we're seeing is the tip of a huge underwater iceberg. ancianita Jun 2014 #34
Exactly, but we even have people here who were members in 2008 nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #35
...and also eating meat. flvegan Jun 2014 #42
We have one of them running for the Senate here in Mississippi. LuvNewcastle Jun 2014 #45
Thank you for posting this - I had completely forgotten that Atlantic article, Raksha Jun 2014 #50
You welcome, and some here are still saying that this is not the case nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #51
I've decided the same thing. There's only so far I'll go. LuvNewcastle Jun 2014 #52
Sarah Palin is in league with dominionists. grasswire Jun 2014 #54
This religious dogma is incompatible with democracy. Enthusiast Jun 2014 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dominionism: This is what...