Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ErikJ

(6,335 posts)
11. Brat said there's something "fishy" about it too.
Tue Jun 17, 2014, 09:48 PM
Jun 2014

Its possible that they collaborated with the videographer to have it released 9/11 to set off Muslim protests at embassies and consullates. That could explain one reason why they were so desperate to deny the protest had anything to do with the film and blame it on Al Quaida attack.
The other theory would be that they cut embassy security funding in 2011 ans 12 which resulted in a deadly embasy attack. So they blamed Obama as a way to deflect blame on them.
But maybe they cut embassy security as part of their conspiracy with the videographer.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»They have SOOOO lost it! ...»Reply #11