Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Will President Obama ever pardon former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman? [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)35. Justice Elena Kagan helped return Siegelman to prison.
Elena Kagan - Willing Accomplice
By Michael Collins
Then, when Siegelman appealed his case to the Supreme Court in 2009, President Obama's Attorney General dispatched Solicitor General Elena Kagan to argue against the appeal in November.
Before accepting the case, Elena Kagan knew or should have known: that the U.S. Attorney who began the Siegelman investigation was closely tied to Karl Rove; that Siegelman never benefited personally from the contribution to an education funding initiative; that the case was so outrageous, forty-four attorneys general petitioned Congress; and, that the presiding judge in the case owned a major interest in a defense firm that received a $178 million federal contract between Siegelman's indictment and trial, a massive conflict of interest.
Most revealing, before her argument against the former governor's appeal, Kagan knew or should have known the following. After two charges had been dropped in a 2009 appeal, Justice Department attorneys recommended a twenty year sentence instead of the seven years already rendered. Fewer offenses for sentencing meant thirteen additional years by the strange logic of federal justice.
Kagan knew or should have known all this and more. That didn't stop her from arguing that Don Siegelman should be kept in jail. ...
That judgment is that Elena Kagan was a willing accomplice in one of the most outrageous political prosecutions of our time. Why should anyone ever trust her?
Her nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States should be rejected unanimously.
SOURCE: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8614514
By Michael Collins
Then, when Siegelman appealed his case to the Supreme Court in 2009, President Obama's Attorney General dispatched Solicitor General Elena Kagan to argue against the appeal in November.
Before accepting the case, Elena Kagan knew or should have known: that the U.S. Attorney who began the Siegelman investigation was closely tied to Karl Rove; that Siegelman never benefited personally from the contribution to an education funding initiative; that the case was so outrageous, forty-four attorneys general petitioned Congress; and, that the presiding judge in the case owned a major interest in a defense firm that received a $178 million federal contract between Siegelman's indictment and trial, a massive conflict of interest.
Most revealing, before her argument against the former governor's appeal, Kagan knew or should have known the following. After two charges had been dropped in a 2009 appeal, Justice Department attorneys recommended a twenty year sentence instead of the seven years already rendered. Fewer offenses for sentencing meant thirteen additional years by the strange logic of federal justice.
Kagan knew or should have known all this and more. That didn't stop her from arguing that Don Siegelman should be kept in jail. ...
That judgment is that Elena Kagan was a willing accomplice in one of the most outrageous political prosecutions of our time. Why should anyone ever trust her?
Her nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States should be rejected unanimously.
SOURCE: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8614514
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Will President Obama ever pardon former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman? [View all]
red dog 1
Jun 2014
OP
If we actually had a "free press", someone surely should put Eric Holder on the spot
hlthe2b
Jun 2014
#1
In May of last year, Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN) asked Holder about the Siegelman case.
red dog 1
Jun 2014
#9
If we had a free press worthy of the name, someone would put Holder on the spot for a lot more
Jack Rabbit
Jun 2014
#17
It should have been done a long time ago... why should he have to wait until Obama's ready to
Ghost in the Machine
Jun 2014
#5
That is a really excellent point, he should have been out within the first year! nt
arthritisR_US
Jun 2014
#19
Well let's get busy and get this man his freedom. Letters, petitions, whatever it takes.
YOHABLO
Jun 2014
#14
Isn't there something on the WH website that if you make a petition and collect 100,000 signatures
arthritisR_US
Jun 2014
#21