General Discussion

Hassin Bin Sober

(27,461 posts)

39. You are missing one huge part of the puzzle: She was fucking innocent!

Wed Jun 18, 2014, 04:06 PM

Jun 2014

The store security detained an innocent person and started this chain of events that lead to physical abuse of a person they knew was disabled.

There's a reason store security has to make damn sure the person shoplifted. And the judgment/settlement will drive that point home to both the police and Walmart.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

55 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Parents Sue Wal-Mart Over Arrest Of Daughter With Special Needs [View all] Jefferson23 Jun 2014 OP

She did nothing wrong, the PD and WalMart should have already settled out of court. Rex Jun 2014 #1

It seems that way to me too. They should be ashammed of themselves for what Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #2

Jodi wound up in handcuffs, muscled to the floor by Livonia police. KamaAina Jun 2014 #3

Fanatical cops, and I am guessing WalMart appreciated that approach..at least up until Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #4

Where was the grandmother? 840high Jun 2014 #54

I don't trust cops atreides1 Jun 2014 #5

I understand that, yet this young woman should be able to see cops perform appropriately Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #7

another great job of PR by the police.. frylock Jun 2014 #6

Exactly..heartwarming job they performed. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #8

nothing says "I want it to go away" Egnever Jun 2014 #9

Less funj, but we should wait for the REST of the story... Demo_Chris Jun 2014 #10

ok, why you doubt them I don't know. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #11

I doubt this version because.... Demo_Chris Jun 2014 #12

Interesting take, and one of the most cynical I have read here in a long time. Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #13

It's not cynical if it's true. Note that the family hasn't released the tape... Demo_Chris Jun 2014 #16

Thanking officers for not taking the easier and safer solution of simply Tasering their Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #19

from the same person who thought the Japanese should sink the Sea Shepherd CreekDog Jun 2014 #37

How many ways can one say, ai yai yai. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #38

Reading through the article, it sounds like the security Ilsa Jun 2014 #21

It is only after the fact that the police and security KNOW any of this... Demo_Chris Jun 2014 #23

As the parent of a Ilsa Jun 2014 #24

The story said she was taken down in a closed room. bluesbassman Jun 2014 #14

They think they can take a mentally disabled child (again) REP Jun 2014 #15

No, she was a TWENTY-FIVE year old woman going freaking nuts in a store. The police showed restraint Demo_Chris Jun 2014 #17

She's still a mentally disabled person. REP Jun 2014 #18

And? What, beyond our compassion and a parking space, does this entitle her to do? Demo_Chris Jun 2014 #20

Alright. yallerdawg Jun 2014 #22

Indeed. I do find it rather bemusing when the very individual who suggests we not make assumptions LanternWaste Jun 2014 #25

It is a dead giveaway yallerdawg Jun 2014 #26

Wow. THAT is your response? joeglow3 Jun 2014 #34

I am entertained tkmorris Jun 2014 #27

That part cracked me up too. nt laundry_queen Jun 2014 #33

Bullshit it isn't. joeglow3 Jun 2014 #35

What precisely is absurd in attempting to discern all relevant knowledge to any given situation? LanternWaste Jun 2014 #28

seems to be a pattern with you on who to side with CreekDog Jun 2014 #36

You are missing one huge part of the puzzle: She was fucking innocent! Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2014 #39

As it turns out she had not shoplifted. It took four cops taking her down to determine that.... Demo_Chris Jun 2014 #44

and you rec'd the "Asian Privilege" thread CreekDog Jun 2014 #41

I did rec that thread, a thread that (as I recall) ended up gathering hundreds of responses... Demo_Chris Jun 2014 #43

then why did you recommend it? CreekDog Jun 2014 #46

because I suspected it would get a billion responses.... Demo_Chris Jun 2014 #47

so you're saying you remember why you recommended it CreekDog Jun 2014 #48

I told you why I recommended it... Demo_Chris Jun 2014 #49

The thread's barely a month old, please, stop running away from your post CreekDog Jun 2014 #50

You love putting words into people's mouths... Demo_Chris Jun 2014 #53

Do you work for Walmart? Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2014 #51

Nope. Never have. With the accusations I was wondering if anyone would ask.... Demo_Chris Jun 2014 #52

so you say to wait to judge, then you say she should have been tasered CreekDog Jun 2014 #42

I said she was lucky she wasn't. nt Demo_Chris Jun 2014 #45

I can understand wrestling her to the floor for a 30-pack of hair bands Orrex Jun 2014 #29

Taser application was suggested as a fair solution in this thread. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #30

Yikes. Poe's Law once again. Orrex Jun 2014 #31

Yep, afraid so. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #32

One of the usual suspects. Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2014 #40

The larger clip capacities increase the danger jberryhill Jun 2014 #55