Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Pussies can push out babies, balls are possibly the most fragile thing on a male body [View all]ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)45. For you
It's not much, but it's a start
Seattle Times to ban 'Redskins'
The Seattle Times sports editor announced Thursday that he will ban use of the word "Redskins" in the paper and online, making the Times the latest publication to stop using the controversial name of Washington's NFL team.
"The most controversial name in sports wont appear again in The Seattle Times print edition or on the seattletimes.com home pages as long as I am sports editor," the Times' Don Shelton wrote. "Its time to ban the use of 'Redskins,' the absurd, offensive and outdated name of the NFL team in Washington, D.C. ... Past time, actually."
Shelton's decision comes on the heels of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's decision to cancel six federal trademarks of the team name because it was found to be disparaging to Native Americans.
We decide, based on the evidence properly before us, that these registrations must be cancelled because they were disparaging to Native Americans at the respective times they were registered, the Patent Offices Trademark Trial and Appeal Board wrote in a 2-1 decision on Wednesday.
The Times is not the first publication to ban use of the word. Slate, the online magazine, announced in August of last year that it would stop using the term. The San Francisco Chronicle announced in October that it would do the same.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2014/06/seattle-times-to-ban-redskins-190719.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Pussies can push out babies, balls are possibly the most fragile thing on a male body [View all]
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
OP
"As the wearer of a set of balls I can attest to their tenderness" Ah, yeah, me too. nt
AverageJoe90
Jun 2014
#61
sure it can be, but when used directly in contrast with balls, you gotta wonder.
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#6
then account for 'grow a pair', can you grow a pair of cannon balls?
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#9
I have been too but then I point that out. we should buy a couple of balls made of brass!
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#29
I personally object to all the ball-shaming going on here. Balls are apparently inadequate when
kysrsoze
Jun 2014
#26
Exactly right. That's why I cringe when someone complains about someone else using it. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Jun 2014
#72
actually, this is not at all exactly right. look up the etymology of pussy. it is at best ambiguous
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#82
I'll go with "deliberately sexist *and* simple ignorance," as the two seem to be conjoined twins.
LanternWaste
Jun 2014
#12
No, not from 'pus'; a Dutch meaning of 'large soft mass' is not thought to be the origin
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2014
#24
Yes, hundreds of years of evolved language should bow to logic and facts and current sensibilities.
CBGLuthier
Jun 2014
#30
and others will fight to the death to keep words like redskins around
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#49
What's wrong with breaking down and analyzing the language we use, at least?
nomorenomore08
Jun 2014
#53
While yet others will not be happy until the entire planet applauds the person rationalizing his own
LanternWaste
Jun 2014
#86
Is stating a reality a slam on your sexuality? Is so, that speaks more of you than others.
Gravitycollapse
Jun 2014
#73
That is the beauty of the vagina dentata myth. It produces violent agency in a passive symbol.
Gravitycollapse
Jun 2014
#71
yeah. i think you're really stretching an argument. i think this boils down to misogynistic language
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#80