Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why aren't Bush and Cheney in prison? [View all]johnnyreb
(915 posts)89. And Off The Record!!
Mr. Bush's reluctant and restrictive cooperation with the panel is consistent with the administration's pattern of stonewalling reasonable requests for documents and testimony and then giving up only the minimum necessary ground when the dispute becomes public. Today's testimony will be in private in the White House, away from reporters or television cameras. The session will not be recorded, and there will be no formal transcript.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/29/opinion/the-president-s-testimony.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/29/opinion/the-president-s-testimony.html
They lied about everything! *
* (Except 9/11)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The wealthy don't usually buy justice, but instead pay to deprive others of justice.
Dark n Stormy Knight
Jun 2014
#12
Absolutely. They're so powerful they got Newsweak to print a retraction 23 years after the fact.
Octafish
Jun 2014
#13
CIA whistleblower John Stockwell on the implications of the presidency of George H.W. Bush...
Octafish
Jun 2014
#66
Rothschilds are so Old Money they're maybe the Oldest, apart from those stone money in Yap...
Octafish
Jun 2014
#15
''No one could have imagined them taking a plane, slamming it into the Pentagon...the (WTC)...''
Octafish
Jun 2014
#60
"United States v. George W. Bush et al." by Elizabeth De La Vega, a former federal prosecutor.
canoeist52
Jun 2014
#6
Because the Democratic Party Leadership is no longer interested in prosecution of war criminals
Exposethefrauds
Jun 2014
#7
If it weren't for the nazis we would not have the modern police state or military we have today!
Exposethefrauds
Jun 2014
#105
If you have the time..."Elizabeth de la Vega - Making a Case For Impeachment "
canoeist52
Jun 2014
#9
Some guy keeps posting "Money trumps peace". Sums it up better than I could. nt
raouldukelives
Jun 2014
#33
Here's my question: What punishment is appropriate for those who are protecting them?
FiveGoodMen
Jun 2014
#40
Isn't everyone who hasn't -- and continues not to -- even try to investigate and prosecute
FiveGoodMen
Jun 2014
#82
Same reason Nixon didnt go to prison, or Reagan, both having committed treason to get elected
randys1
Jun 2014
#51
Instead of prison, just put Bush, Cheney and the gang on a plane to Iraq and dump them on the
aint_no_life_nowhere
Jun 2014
#59
That is ridiculous, there are those who presided over the Nuremberg trials and have weighed in
Jefferson23
Jun 2014
#93
Understandable..blunt and coarse is on point and should not always be avoided. n/t
Jefferson23
Jun 2014
#99
Because B613 is in charge, and there is nothing we can do, and there is nothing Pres Obama
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#100