Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Say whatever horrible word you want which expresses your terrible sentiment. [View all]nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)14. Not "solution" so much as "counteraction" I suppose.
Not that one speech-act erases another, but if you object to something someone says, your objection helps promulgate the idea that maybe they shouldn't have said it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Say whatever horrible word you want which expresses your terrible sentiment. [View all]
Gravitycollapse
Jun 2014
OP
Interesting approach; that said, isn't the solution to offensive speech MORE speech?
MADem
Jun 2014
#2
I mean a resolution that would make ME smug, satisfied, and feeling as though the
MADem
Jun 2014
#12
I don't need to ask him what he meant because what he meant was transparently obvious.
Gravitycollapse
Jun 2014
#22
Seriously, the self-righteous crowd here thinks they are owed beer and travel money.
Rex
Jun 2014
#20
I think the point is more that TRP (or his persona) *intends* to be disgusting and "piggish"
nomorenomore08
Jun 2014
#19
I can understand and respect that view. As I said, everyone has to choose where to draw the line
nomorenomore08
Jun 2014
#25
But that might actually be the worst part. That he does bring so much to the table...
Gravitycollapse
Jun 2014
#30
I can't disagree with that at all. It's on him, ultimately, to draw his own line.
nomorenomore08
Jun 2014
#32
I think he has crossed the line at times, certainly. I don't blame people for being offended.
nomorenomore08
Jun 2014
#28
I dunno. Just pointing out that the sentiment is judged "terrible" based on the words used.
Throd
Jun 2014
#17
Thinking Ann Coulter is a cunt, for instance, is not part and parcel to thinking she is wrong.
Gravitycollapse
Jun 2014
#26
Exactly. Insulting her ideas or her as a person isn't the same as gratuitously insulting her gender.
nomorenomore08
Jun 2014
#29
Exactly. I would even argue that the two aren't really even compatible.
Gravitycollapse
Jun 2014
#34
So let's take a step back for a moment to identify a key difference here...
Gravitycollapse
Jun 2014
#36
I think calling him fat or a pillhead is wrong because it does mock those people.
Gravitycollapse
Jun 2014
#38
Where is my joy? It's certainly not in using slurs against those I disagree with.
Gravitycollapse
Jun 2014
#35
He's talking about slurs, not profanities. Though the line between the two isn't always set in stone
nomorenomore08
Jun 2014
#44