Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: On common Core [View all]
 

TheKentuckian

(26,314 posts)
67. That isn't what I said and I have never evah have suggested anyone listen to Orange and Smarm
Fri Jun 20, 2014, 05:46 PM
Jun 2014

Last edited Sun Jun 22, 2014, 11:10 AM - Edit history (1)

for any reason.

It sounds like you are stating the Wealthcare and Profit Protection Act do more harm than good to achieve something potentially laudable but dwarfed in benefit to harm done. I'm not willing to go that far, though I have ever stated that potentially this could be the case and as such did not support passage of the final bill but I will say I do see it very much like I do part D, a boondoggle that should not have been passed but I am unwilling to say either should be recinded until they are superceded by laws that provide the benefits without screwing the pooch seven ways until Sunday because lives are at stake and the benefits to alleviate pretty massive suffering and pain are in place.

So, yeah the logic can be said to be COMPARABLE but not the same at all. National standards are not pressing, life and death matters. I don't see any argument articulated saying that folks are going to die by the thousands and suffer by the millions without this benefit. I don't think these health care crisis situations are remotely compare able to national standard in education. Especially with what you are willing to trade to get there, I don't see how you could imply that there is any net benefit and I keep identifying deep net harms that you don't even argue with.

On this track, if you get your way there will be little left of education for most children with public education gutted and made a mockery of, virtually no effective organized labor, and lots of kids robbed of their futures other than as barely literate drones for low level work.

Cost to benefit ALWAYS applies, Nadine. I can see the arguments for health care (I also don't see the same magnitude of costs and harm from current for standards either) but not for this even though I agree in principle. National standards are not more important than education, they are a tool to enhance education and make sure the kid in Mississippi gets the same quality and depth of knowledge that the kid in Vermont gets. I don't see the value as as high as you seem to. Nice feature, not of overriding importance.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

On common Core [View all] nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 OP
Excellent analysis. Pisces Jun 2014 #1
Thanks, I enjoy policy these days nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #2
We will never see great innovation from our society again until we invest in our liberal_at_heart Jun 2014 #3
And that us what the emphasis in creative thinking at San Diego Unified does nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #4
So what happens to the kids that can't keep up with the curriculum? Do they get a more liberal_at_heart Jun 2014 #5
In other places around the world they would not have waited that long nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #8
Actually our last school that we had such problems with the math curriculum was in affluent liberal_at_heart Jun 2014 #10
Then your child would be in a special needs class nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #11
Special education children are not the only ones who learn differently or at a different pace. liberal_at_heart Jun 2014 #12
Have fun nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #13
Ok I will go public with this. nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #23
My son would be much better off without Common Core because they would be focusing on his liberal_at_heart Jun 2014 #28
Then consider home schooling nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #29
you can argue till you're blue in the face. Even his teachers know Common Core and Race to the liberal_at_heart Jun 2014 #31
I am not arguing nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #36
I agree. I think you and I are done discussing this. I am not going to change your mind and you are liberal_at_heart Jun 2014 #45
I have walked those shoes nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #46
Oh and I forgot nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #30
I agree. And Common Core is making people money too. liberal_at_heart Jun 2014 #32
It is not common core nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #35
You are not listening. He was doing fine in elementary school when they were allowed to teach liberal_at_heart Jun 2014 #44
Talk to your elected, yes elected and *very local,* nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #48
Again, this is a middle school issue and not a common core issue. He's currently in 6th grade, right RayOfHope Jun 2014 #54
This message was self-deleted by its author FourScore Jun 2014 #60
This isnt CC. This is middle school versus elementary school issue. RayOfHope Jun 2014 #51
liberal_at_heart, your child is so fortunate to have you. FourScore Jun 2014 #61
Thanks and you are so correct nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #63
Usually the curricula are the same, but many districts use "differentiated learning." GreenEyedLefty Jun 2014 #25
In general things have gotten much better nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #27
sounds good in theory, but my son has never experienced this is in the Common Core real world. liberal_at_heart Jun 2014 #33
Not really. Saying "it isn't that bad of an idea" a few times TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #37
We know the intent nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #38
No, some like to think they can walk and chew gum at the same time when they are going to TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #57
Then by your logic we should have listened to Cantor and Bachman and never implemented the ACA nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #58
That isn't what I said and I have never evah have suggested anyone listen to Orange and Smarm TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #67
Actually national standards are pressing nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #68
I don't disagree with you about the benefit, Nadine. I disagree about the net value of the benefit TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #69
Alas the brain drain will continue to deepen nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #70
You have noticed that our efforts have only exacerbated the situation? TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #71
Sorry, I am not being cantankerous nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #72
Yep. The underlying idea is important. SheilaT Jun 2014 #6
And we have been fighting this battle nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #9
It would be nice if we could have a nuanced discussion about this. I think the policy is good and Pisces Jun 2014 #17
Some school systems are experimenting nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #26
Similar to International Baccalaureate ... created for diplomats' kids frazzled Jun 2014 #7
Wow, that sounds incredible. I am going to look into this. Thank you for the info. Pisces Jun 2014 #15
Start here frazzled Jun 2014 #22
Thank you !!! Pisces Jun 2014 #24
People also don't realize/know that CC is NOT A CURRICULUM. I keep reading "my kid didn't learn.. RayOfHope Jun 2014 #14
Exactly nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #16
I think that the assessment should be removed for at least 2 years while schools and teacher figure Pisces Jun 2014 #18
Don't quote me, yet. nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #19
That would make sense. I hope that roles out to the rest of the country. I don't think states should Pisces Jun 2014 #20
Given the school system in NOLA, on purpose nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #21
Then why are there Common Core text books? It is a curriculum. They tried to force my son to learn liberal_at_heart Jun 2014 #43
I will try one last time nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #47
It is *not* a curriculum. Curriculums lay out a scope and sequence, outline lessons, provide RayOfHope Jun 2014 #49
do you have any links that support that Common Core is rooted in the experience cali Jun 2014 #34
Here's the great thing though, local districts still have control of how they teach it and when RayOfHope Jun 2014 #53
I'm suspicious of the profit motive behind this CC concept bigtree Jun 2014 #39
And I will point you to the mid level policy nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #40
I don't have trouble with the targets bigtree Jun 2014 #41
CC is just targets at DOE nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #42
I wish I could recommend this post about ten million times. n/t RayOfHope Jun 2014 #50
Excellent posts, all through this thread nadin. nt msanthrope Jun 2014 #52
I am not expert on this standingtall Jun 2014 #55
And that you are critizing is not Common Core nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #56
I'm confused. FourScore Jun 2014 #59
Common core is the goals nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #62
I'm sorry, I'm still confused. FourScore Jun 2014 #64
State mandated tests nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #65
Yep! That's what I thought. I hate them. n/t FourScore Jun 2014 #66
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»On common Core»Reply #67