General Discussion

Go Vols

(5,902 posts)

31. verdict is in

Fri Jun 20, 2014, 05:54 PM

Jun 2014

On Fri Jun 20, 2014, 05:47 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Thinking Ann Coulter is a cunt, for instance, is not part and parcel to thinking she is wrong.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5128387

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

I am SICK of seeing men throwing around that hateful misogynist word! Please! Enough!

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Jun 20, 2014, 05:53 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: There's never a justification for use of that word. Dead wrong.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alerter should probably read the post. The author was actually agreeing with them. Deep breaths, alerter. Not everything is an attack on women.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: How is this different than calling someone a dick, which happens here frequently?

Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I vote to leave it alone because this is what DU has become. A bunch of potty-mouthed adolescents (in thoughts and words if not in chronological age) and they're welcome to it. Beavis and Butthead live!!!!
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Whatever GC meant to say, if he didn't know that "cunt" is offensive to many on DU, especially on a heading, he hasn't adjusted to his environment. Note that I'm a man and I'm being harder on GC than on a woman who used "prick" in a heading because I'm tired of false equivalencies.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Say whatever horrible word you want which expresses your terrible sentiment. [View all] Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 OP

Dinsdale dipsydoodle Jun 2014 #1

Interesting approach; that said, isn't the solution to offensive speech MORE speech? MADem Jun 2014 #2

What do you mean by "solution?" Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #3

I mean a resolution that would make ME smug, satisfied, and feeling as though the MADem Jun 2014 #12

Not "solution" so much as "counteraction" I suppose. nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #14

No - the answer is to stop giving words power. dipsydoodle Jun 2014 #6

Well, that's not possible. Words often DO have power... MADem Jun 2014 #9

Oh stifle you big fat poopie head! whistler162 Jun 2014 #4

Mr. Clean Kingofalldems Jun 2014 #5

Feel whatever you want, just don't pretend other people must as well. Rex Jun 2014 #7

I'm not entirely certain what you're arguing here. Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #15

I'm saying don't pretend you are the knower of all things. Rex Jun 2014 #18

I don't need to ask him what he meant because what he meant was transparently obvious. Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #22

Thanks for making my point. Rex Jun 2014 #27

Very true that everyone draws the line a bit differently. n/t nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #16

Seriously, the self-righteous crowd here thinks they are owed beer and travel money. Rex Jun 2014 #20

+ a million Egnever Jun 2014 #39

Belgium. muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 #8

Piggishness should be used very sparingly frazzled Jun 2014 #10

I think the point is more that TRP (or his persona) *intends* to be disgusting and "piggish" nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #19

Yes, I know that; but it still gets boring and sometimes offensive frazzled Jun 2014 #23

I can understand and respect that view. As I said, everyone has to choose where to draw the line nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #25

But that might actually be the worst part. That he does bring so much to the table... Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #30

I can't disagree with that at all. It's on him, ultimately, to draw his own line. nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #32

There really is no defense for it. redqueen Jun 2014 #24

I think he has crossed the line at times, certainly. I don't blame people for being offended. nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #28

+1. Well expressed, frazzled. brer cat Jun 2014 #21

How about horrible words for wonderful sentiment? Throd Jun 2014 #11

What sentiment would that be? Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #13

I dunno. Just pointing out that the sentiment is judged "terrible" based on the words used. Throd Jun 2014 #17

Thinking Ann Coulter is a cunt, for instance, is not part and parcel to thinking she is wrong. Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #26

Exactly. Insulting her ideas or her as a person isn't the same as gratuitously insulting her gender. nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #29

Exactly. I would even argue that the two aren't really even compatible. Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #34

verdict is in Go Vols Jun 2014 #31

So let's take a step back for a moment to identify a key difference here... Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #36

Can I say Rush Limbaugh is a stupid, fat pillhead? Throd Jun 2014 #37

I think calling him fat or a pillhead is wrong because it does mock those people. Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #38

Get a grip... DryHump Jun 2014 #33

Where is my joy? It's certainly not in using slurs against those I disagree with. Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #35

Totalitarian? Where has anyone advocated outright censoring the guy? nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #43

The rude pundit should be banned from DU! Dragonfli Jun 2014 #40

My wife's favorite word was "FUCK!" hobbit709 Jun 2014 #41

He's talking about slurs, not profanities. Though the line between the two isn't always set in stone nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #44

suckling pig nipples betsuni Jun 2014 #42