Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ‘Bullsh*t!’ Greenwald and Iraq Vet Blow Up on Real Time over Snowden Leaks [View all]MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)38. Nah, I can see you putting him on that pedestal.
It's sad, really.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
158 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
‘Bullsh*t!’ Greenwald and Iraq Vet Blow Up on Real Time over Snowden Leaks [View all]
babylonsister
Jun 2014
OP
Believe in the government and you won't mind seeing the rich get richer off wars without end.
Octafish
Jun 2014
#2
Haha. GG thinks it works for him.. he sure showed his a$$ last night. Course with his
Cha
Jun 2014
#90
Well maybe, but he was right in his statements on RT last night (free HBO weekend - only time I
Hestia
Jun 2014
#11
GG's doing this for money just like every other mercenary.. but, yeah you put your trust
Cha
Jun 2014
#95
Thousands of documents that are possible security threats being released in the hands
lumpy
Jun 2014
#81
Interesting that Greenwald brought up Rand Paul as an alternative to Hillary.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
Jun 2014
#15
I'll ignore it because it didn't happen. The link below includes the segment about the 2016 election
Luminous Animal
Jun 2014
#88
And there it is! He made similar noises about Gary Johnson in '12. Why his work....
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2014
#59
I'm just glad the Paul could stand to be in the same room with GG's smarmy face.
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2014
#72
No he didn't. Maher introduced Paul as the likely candidate. Greenwald was largely mute
Luminous Animal
Jun 2014
#86
Greenwald's comment was that many neo-cons are now supporting Hillary.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
Jun 2014
#92
Exactly what I've been saying all these years.. the "arrogant piece of shit" part. He can never be
Cha
Jun 2014
#82
only Greenwald is allowed to make Money with the Book Deals, Film Deals, Omidyar's Billions
JI7
Jun 2014
#58
Like John Kerry, our 2004 Presidential candidate, service can inform one's political viewpoint.
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#35
You know, calling fellow DUers "turds" because your hero, GG was disparaged, does not encourage
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#41
But we aren't talking about "anyone." We are talking about your behavior. nt
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#45
Yes, that sunshine will certainly feel great if those documents that are detrimental to
lumpy
Jun 2014
#93
Precisely!!! Comity within the community is important. Neither GG or ES are members of our
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#71
It would be real journalism by Glenn Greenwald should he tell the complete story, who is behind
Thinkingabout
Jun 2014
#54
Unfortunately I do understand, understand why there was a non disclosure as a requirement of
Thinkingabout
Jun 2014
#125
Shit! It's worse than we thought, Nance! Look what's happening in Europe right fucking now!
randome
Jun 2014
#143
Read Greenwald's book and your clever questions will be answered. Your questions are a substitute
ancianita
Jun 2014
#145
You base your distrust upon nothing but fantasy and hearsay. You sound like right wingers
ancianita
Jun 2014
#153
"No, you!" I'm not one to believe "official sources" anymore, that's true. I've lived
ancianita
Jun 2014
#155
Wow, you're so right! Sorry about the non-grammatical nonsense. I was tired. The point is that IN
ancianita
Jun 2014
#157
Rieckhoff was rude. Obviously hadn't read Greenwald's book. Thinks because he's fought, he's right.
ancianita
Jun 2014
#79
"Rieckhoff was rude"? Oh right.. of course.. GG was a model of decorum and it's everyone
Cha
Jun 2014
#89
You mad? I didn't say he didn't have a right to voice his opinion. He shut out other opinions.
ancianita
Jun 2014
#103
Please explicitly state what Rieckhoff said that was "standing up for the truth."
ancianita
Jun 2014
#115
They're both honorable men. The country needs them both. The entire exchange was only at the depth
ancianita
Jun 2014
#119
Greenwald wasn't rude when he wouldn't let his opponent get a word in edgewise? Sure.
lumpy
Jun 2014
#101
Intelligent questions, sure; not presumptuous questions like "why is Snowden hiding" in Russia.
ancianita
Jun 2014
#106
"Bullshit" was the one and only interruption. And it was the right response, too. Please tell me all
ancianita
Jun 2014
#104
"Bullshit" was Rude.. but of course the fans give the slithery one a pass on that.
Cha
Jun 2014
#129
Thank you. That's how I saw the exchange. Maher did say that Greenwald's ideas and book were to be
ancianita
Jun 2014
#117
Well, as I said before, his show over the last eight years has only given cursory intros on issues
ancianita
Jun 2014
#124
Greenwald responded: "You should have evidence for accusations you want to make." HELL YES.
ancianita
Jun 2014
#120
Agreed. They "got it" because they know who has their best interests at heart.
ancianita
Jun 2014
#127
"Please tell me how leaking intelligence to Terrorist Organizations is a Good thing?"
Cha
Jun 2014
#130
No one leaked anything to any terrorist organization and the "intelligence" and surveillance agencie
TheKentuckian
Jun 2014
#144
An utterly meaningless amendment by Sensenbrenner? Look....if Jimbo actually wanted to
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#148
