Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sudopod

(5,019 posts)
130. ;_;
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 08:01 PM
Apr 2012

It's a crime how we treat people in this country.

At least you're doing something about it!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

In fairness, I'm pretty sure that's what Jesus would have done. Lucy Goosey Apr 2012 #1
Breaking and entering? When would he have done that? badtoworse Apr 2012 #7
Beats me. The moneychangers were glad to see him. nt raouldukelives Apr 2012 #17
OH SNAP nt sudopod Apr 2012 #51
Beat me to it. Kudos. n/t Egalitarian Thug Apr 2012 #57
The money changers was about respect for a house of worship. badtoworse Apr 2012 #71
It was just terrible how they carried that building off. nt sudopod Apr 2012 #86
If it doesn't fit, it doesn't fit. badtoworse Apr 2012 #100
Ah, well, as long as God says so. nt sudopod Apr 2012 #108
The Vision Of Christ That Thou Dost See -- William Blake Leopolds Ghost Apr 2012 #150
And Jesus wouldn't have let the homeless into the property? Really? Zalatix Apr 2012 #147
Asking for shelter and being refused is not the same as breaking in and being thrown out. badtoworse Apr 2012 #148
I'm sure Jesus would've been quite chuffed to learn that squatting is legal under ancient common-law Leopolds Ghost Apr 2012 #151
Maybe not but... lame54 Apr 2012 #31
ask the money changers got root Apr 2012 #140
How some can twist things around. The Diocese ordered the building cleared because they were demosincebirth Apr 2012 #2
Please provide a link for this. It is the first I am hearing about it. nt LaydeeBug Apr 2012 #3
No link. If you were watching the local evening news KGOTV in the Bay area you would have heard demosincebirth Apr 2012 #141
thanks for the proof... lame54 Apr 2012 #4
Actually, they are trying to lease it for $11,000 a month... Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #20
and there it is... lame54 Apr 2012 #35
What amount should they try to lease it for in San Francisco? nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #37
Sell a few of the Pope's hats and feed and shelter the homeless lame54 Apr 2012 #40
That does not answer the question. nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #41
Here's your answer... unapatriciated Apr 2012 #47
To who? nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #48
Why not try something innovative... unapatriciated Apr 2012 #78
I imagine it is a matter of liability. Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #87
Catholic Charities in San Francisco are not allowed to have Catholic rules Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #137
Ahhh and there's the rub. unapatriciated Apr 2012 #142
No drugs or alcohol is a string? nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #145
That is not what I'm talking about and I suspect you know that. unapatriciated Apr 2012 #149
Homeless? Try trespassers. badtoworse Apr 2012 #5
What do you call keeping a building vacant when the homeless are enduring sickness and cold EFerrari Apr 2012 #8
It doesn't matter what you call it. Breaking and entering is still illegal. badtoworse Apr 2012 #16
Just like Jesus wanted. sudopod Apr 2012 #52
We've been through this on another thread. badtoworse Apr 2012 #84
Ok, I guess? sudopod Apr 2012 #85
It's not about winning. We just see it differently. badtoworse Apr 2012 #106
The trouble that some folks see anything outside of the status quo as antagonizing. nt sudopod Apr 2012 #111
Catholic homeless shelter in San Francisco. Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #88
Good thing there's only 65 homeless families in SF. sudopod Apr 2012 #91
And that's the only Catholic shelter? Where is the OWS equivalent? nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #94
You are excellent at missing the point on purpose. sudopod Apr 2012 #96
Vacant or not, who does the liability fall to if someone's drunk dog bites someone in that building? Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #99
Don't worry, they have lawyers. Maybe not as expensive ones as the Church. sudopod Apr 2012 #101
Lawyers don't transfer liability. nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #102
Clearly you have the wrong lawyers. nt sudopod Apr 2012 #104
There is a reason why even the big corps have to settle when there is an injury in their stores. nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #105
I guess OWS will get sued into oblivion. lol nt sudopod Apr 2012 #110
Sue who? nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #112
? sudopod Apr 2012 #113
The parents and perhaps the hospital. My original question once again. Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #117
I have this crazy idea sudopod Apr 2012 #120
Derelict? Not sure it is that. Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #121
So why the mailed fist instead of the olive branch, eh? sudopod Apr 2012 #122
I imagine the first fist thrown was the b and e. Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #125
Who knows? sudopod Apr 2012 #127
If that was the intent and if they building was in fact derelict. Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #131
Not to mention several posters have told the story of what happened in Atlanta. sudopod Apr 2012 #97
Yes, it is and now they will have that on their consciences EFerrari Apr 2012 #64
Catholic homeless shelter in San Francisco. Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #89
You know it was illegal to be a Jew in Nazi Germany. Cleita Apr 2012 #15
Where do these people come from? Egalitarian Thug Apr 2012 #58
Your corporate dictatorship appreciates your support mmonk Apr 2012 #143
OWS shouldn't have to respect private property? Why not? badtoworse Apr 2012 #144
Well, that's a shitty headline. Brickbat Apr 2012 #6
Agree. Not accurate and not the title of the linked article. cbayer Apr 2012 #9
It what way is it not accurate? unapatriciated Apr 2012 #70
Where do you see in the article that there were homeless staying in the building? cbayer Apr 2012 #73
Some of OWS members are part of the homeless. unapatriciated Apr 2012 #76
While I don't dispute that some OWS members are homeless, there just isn't cbayer Apr 2012 #77
Whatever... unapatriciated Apr 2012 #79
Didn't know of your personal relationship with OP and completely understand your cbayer Apr 2012 #81
his point and mine are that.. unapatriciated Apr 2012 #83
We also get into trouble when we jump to conclusions. EFerrari Apr 2012 #103
Good to know. None of this is included in the articles that I could find. cbayer Apr 2012 #115
I put one in #72. EFerrari Apr 2012 #124
Sounds like a great group and a great guy. cbayer Apr 2012 #128
That's my ex. He fronted all our events EFerrari Apr 2012 #132
A better headline: Catholic Church cares for homeless... lame54 Apr 2012 #11
Your thread headline is completely wrong. HappyMe Apr 2012 #10
I'm always up for a good correction... lame54 Apr 2012 #12
Catholic Church Evicts Occupy. HappyMe Apr 2012 #18
We went down to the... lame54 Apr 2012 #24
The article wasn't about the homeless in Atlanta. HappyMe Apr 2012 #27
you've said one thing right today... lame54 Apr 2012 #42
Your post is completely wrong. EFerrari Apr 2012 #109
Post removed Post removed Apr 2012 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author Initech Apr 2012 #14
"Activists said they chose to take over the building because they believed it has been vacant... Brickbat Apr 2012 #19
The building has been vacant. It has been vacant for 18 months. Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #21
So what if it is vacant? HappyMe Apr 2012 #23
I was specifically addressing this point that was made in the post to which I replied... Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #26
So what? HappyMe Apr 2012 #30
Much as we may presume to know what their intentions are LanternWaste Apr 2012 #49
paint over it... lame54 Apr 2012 #28
"Alex, you'd better be drinking your water!" KamaAina Apr 2012 #33
extra points for fabricated headline. dionysus Apr 2012 #22
I could use extra points lame54 Apr 2012 #29
Do you guys have a listserv or something? nt sudopod Apr 2012 #54
Nah. Just the GD thread list. MineralMan Apr 2012 #63
uh, it's quite obvious from readingthe thread that a headline was fabricated... dionysus Apr 2012 #67
It's his opinion of what happened. unapatriciated Apr 2012 #69
What dog doesn't love tequila? Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #25
Hmm...that title for your OP...could be better. MineralMan Apr 2012 #32
the actions of the church could be better... lame54 Apr 2012 #34
What would you like to see them do? nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #36
Go away for good lame54 Apr 2012 #38
Not likely. nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #39
... lame54 Apr 2012 #43
Probably so. MineralMan Apr 2012 #44
They certainly are making a lot of the graffiti... unapatriciated Apr 2012 #46
Yes. Well... MineralMan Apr 2012 #53
I think you should donate the paint... lame54 Apr 2012 #55
No, it's not cheap. MineralMan Apr 2012 #56
I call bullshit - We went down to the... lame54 Apr 2012 #59
You can call whatever you want. MineralMan Apr 2012 #60
that's good to know lame54 Apr 2012 #61
The restaurants in San Francisco are better than Stockton. nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #66
You coudn't be more wrong. EFerrari Apr 2012 #72
Catholic homeless shelter in San Francisco. Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #90
CTRL-V sudopod Apr 2012 #92
What does that even mean to you? EFerrari Apr 2012 #95
Sounds like a comprehensive facility. I would love to see a joint effort between the church and Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #98
For which the city pays them. In fiscal year 2008-2009, St. Josephs received Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #136
As Lame54 has stated in this thread before... unapatriciated Apr 2012 #74
This was about visibility for OWS, not helping the homeless. badtoworse Apr 2012 #75
No, that's wrong. See #72. nt EFerrari Apr 2012 #126
I imagine that's we should be asking of ourselves LanternWaste Apr 2012 #50
The church ask of others all the time. unapatriciated Apr 2012 #68
Republican jesus is a nasty fella. sarcasmo Apr 2012 #45
Well, to give credit where it's due the Church SomethingFishy Apr 2012 #62
Great pix bongbong Apr 2012 #65
They're leaving that vacant in San Francisco? nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #93
Nah, but they are saving their pennies to buy this: sudopod Apr 2012 #123
Doesn't sound like the Catholic church owns it just yet. Sounds like they got the property for a Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #133
:3 nt sudopod Apr 2012 #135
Monstrosity... SomethingFishy Apr 2012 #138
lol, he's got a point there. nt sudopod Apr 2012 #139
OWS was set up to protest churches? Yo_Mama Apr 2012 #80
The Catholic Church is a huge landholder in San Francisco EFerrari Apr 2012 #114
How xtian of them...nt and-justice-for-all Apr 2012 #82
Hve you seen this at TruthOut? "Empty Buildings Are the Crime": EFerrari Apr 2012 #107
Wow. The "Get Off My Lawn" group TriMera Apr 2012 #116
""Get Off My Lawn"" sudopod Apr 2012 #118
Be my guest. TriMera Apr 2012 #119
You know what I wonder? West Side Crisis was the last hope EFerrari Apr 2012 #129
;_; sudopod Apr 2012 #130
I'm not doing much these days. EFerrari Apr 2012 #134
Catholic Church Evicts Homeless...? Zorra Apr 2012 #146
Since it's Easter Sunday, I figure a Gospel Verse might be appropriate. *aahahem* Leopolds Ghost Apr 2012 #152
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Catholic Church Evicts Ho...»Reply #130