Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
32. Thanks, but the story is a tad four years old
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 12:48 AM
Jun 2014

I thought I had heard of it, and yes... it is a big fucking deal from a science perspective. Silly me, expecting an update.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And yet, creationists continue to erode science education... hlthe2b Jun 2014 #1
But of course we know, man4allcats Jun 2014 #2
And they have been reduced to idiot minorities in Europe, yet here... hlthe2b Jun 2014 #3
Sometimes I wonder how we managed to beat the British. man4allcats Jun 2014 #8
Indeed... n/t hlthe2b Jun 2014 #9
We conned the French into helping us, that's how.... Moonwalk Jun 2014 #25
I agree. man4allcats Jun 2014 #33
yes but Phlem Jun 2014 #4
Unfortunately ... n/t man4allcats Jun 2014 #5
Strangly enough, many of the earliest biologists were creationists. Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #7
Even Newton believed in the divine. man4allcats Jun 2014 #10
Science itself was fundamental to the teleological argument. I'm not sure that's a bias. Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #14
I don't think science has any desire to make religious faith obsolete. man4allcats Jun 2014 #15
That's simply historical revisionism. Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #17
Science certainly WAS deeply interwoven into religious experience, man4allcats Jun 2014 #18
Some scientists are trying to read the truth written by God's own hand in the rocks, the stars, tclambert Jun 2014 #23
Re: "Some think God created a multiverse containing an uncountable number of universes." man4allcats Jun 2014 #27
I was expecting another john McCain photo. lindysalsagal Jun 2014 #6
McCain? Well, he might be around 2 billion years old, man4allcats Jun 2014 #12
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #11
:-) n/t man4allcats Jun 2014 #13
That's so cool! NealK Jun 2014 #16
It IS cool, isn't it? man4allcats Jun 2014 #39
I don't think it took 2 billion years, It's more likely fits and starts. Blue State Bandit Jun 2014 #19
I like the "fits and starts" idea. man4allcats Jun 2014 #21
DNA might not even be from earth, originally nikto Jun 2014 #20
I once knew a postdoc who thought that man4allcats Jun 2014 #22
And then there's LUCA defacto7 Jun 2014 #24
Thanks for the post. man4allcats Jun 2014 #30
Informative wiki. defacto7 Jun 2014 #42
I thought this was going to be a Cheney thread mindwalker_i Jun 2014 #26
LOL! :-) n/t man4allcats Jun 2014 #40
That's hard to believe ECHOFIELDS Jun 2014 #28
Me too. ;-) n/t man4allcats Jun 2014 #31
Huge News. Phlem Jun 2014 #29
Thanks! man4allcats Jun 2014 #41
Thanks, but the story is a tad four years old nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #32
Sorry. Didn't mean to bore you. man4allcats Jun 2014 #34
I did not say it is not relevant nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #35
Re: "Please do not misconstrue what I said. " man4allcats Jun 2014 #36
Tell you what, so we do not have these conflicts in the future nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #37
Thank you. n/t man4allcats Jun 2014 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Complex, multicellular li...»Reply #32