Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Veerrry interesting stats on charitable contributions by State....I wouldn't have guessed it. [View all]clarice
(5,504 posts)142. I googled Priyanka and the first 5 posts, where pictures of a beautiful Bollywood actress. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
245 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Veerrry interesting stats on charitable contributions by State....I wouldn't have guessed it. [View all]
clarice
Jun 2014
OP
As the first comment notes: misleading in that it equates charitable giving with religious giving.
PeaceNikki
Jun 2014
#4
churches are for-profit entities using religion as the sales pitch and should be taxed nt
msongs
Jun 2014
#8
Exactly. Would be interested to see results with religious donations factored out. nt
stevenleser
Jun 2014
#19
I agree. Churches may do some charitable work, but much of the money they receive goes
Arkansas Granny
Jun 2014
#22
Agree with previous posters: When people are taught that part of being a good Christian is tithing,
Coventina
Jun 2014
#10
This includes forced contributions to religion and contributions to political social welfare groups?
Fred Sanders
Jun 2014
#11
How much of those "charitable contributions" goes to churches in conservative states?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2014
#17
more religious states donate more to charity. i haven't seen the map, but thats my guess
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#20
religious charities often come with strings attached. i am not against charity
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#24
and that texas is awesome. which is maybe in some respects but its a political nightmare zone
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#82
It is actually a very friendly place to live...neighbors helping neighbors...etc. nt
clarice
Jun 2014
#90
Why in the world would anyone do that? ........it's sneaky and untoward. IMHO. nt
clarice
Jun 2014
#112
Me too !!!!!! I lost partial hearing in one ear from a homemade firecracker!! nt
clarice
Jun 2014
#150
WTF is that even supposed to mean? Explain yourself. Did you read what I wrote?
PeaceNikki
Jun 2014
#33
Explain yourself. You made a shitty dig trying to offend me. Apologize or stand by it.
PeaceNikki
Jun 2014
#50
Well if I offended you....my sincerest apologies...is that a yes to the truce.......
clarice
Jun 2014
#122
Not trying to fight.....Are you against all donations from individuals/churches/ companies? nt
clarice
Jun 2014
#35
no, i just dont think that donations to religious institutions are anything to be glorified.
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#44
good for you. next time you post about an issue, you should try to be less uninformed about it. nt
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#55
And you my dear should learn common courtesy...That's ok...maybe you're just having a bad day. Peace
clarice
Jun 2014
#60
i'm having a great day and maybe if you were less of a passive aggressive poster you'd get
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#62
then maybe try to cut the passive aggressive shit. i am a new yorker and am fine with rudeness
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#78
i think you miss my point. there are millions of priyanka's. i have no idea who
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#141
I googled Priyanka and the first 5 posts, where pictures of a beautiful Bollywood actress. nt
clarice
Jun 2014
#142
maybe because they think not being glorified is the same as being attacked
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#226
Why would my post be considered RW stirring ? I said that I was surprised by results on the list.
clarice
Jun 2014
#32
well if it makes you feel better, then my other conclusion is that any one surprised
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#34
yes, women in general are prohibited from expressing that somethings should be pretty obvious
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#39
is conflating issues your strongest point? or do you have some other talent in debate?
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#53
well that was either a shitty debate team or you have lost your particular talent. nt
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#59
I think that you mis-understood. I'm all for women or anyone who has a different opinion than mine.
clarice
Jun 2014
#67
Were you also surprised by it last year when you posted the exact same link?
Bjorn Against
Jun 2014
#130
and all these du'ers who can't see through this BS. i don't know who is more laughable
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#228
None of that means a thing because they are giving to their own churches and political causes. When
jwirr
Jun 2014
#42
also, which states continuously vote in politicians who tax them at a higher rate
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#48
Exactly. Look at how the government treats the needy in their state and it will tell you a lot more
jwirr
Jun 2014
#70
Exactly. A 10% REQUIREMENT that's spent feeding and sheltering missionaries is not "charity"
arcane1
Jun 2014
#68
This site gives a breakdown (by region) that excludes religious contributions.
PotatoChip
Jun 2014
#74
If you want to discuss how the churches spend the contributions they receive....
MaggieD
Jun 2014
#129
I'm not at all surprised. The type of "charities" they are measuring are basically tax dodges where
corkhead
Jun 2014
#108
They are giving most of that money to their churches - very little of which probably
kestrel91316
Jun 2014
#148
I'm not sure what you mean,,,I'm not a Christian, nor do I have any affiliation. nt
clarice
Jun 2014
#153
My sincerest apologies....I miss- understood.....I' guess I've been attacked....
clarice
Jun 2014
#162
When you go to the Piggley Wiggley to buy a Yoo-Hoo, what do you pay with ? nt
clarice
Jun 2014
#176
Those statistics only hold for when people giving to their churches is included.
scarletwoman
Jun 2014
#171
It is a place where you send your money to make religious conmen very happy.
BlueStreak
Jun 2014
#194
Not being a church goer, I'm not sure of the percentages. I would love to see hard statistics....
clarice
Jun 2014
#184
Churches are not required to disclose how they spend their money (or even how much they get)
A Little Weird
Jun 2014
#195
When you exclude religious charities/churches, things look rather different. . .
Stargleamer
Jun 2014
#188
we understand this just fine. what we don't care much about is the extrapolation
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#227
And on the third day...she rested. Thanks for all of the feedback. Adios for now. nt
clarice
Jun 2014
#232