Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Veerrry interesting stats on charitable contributions by State....I wouldn't have guessed it. [View all]RainDog
(28,784 posts)237. I didn't even know about this past posting history
and I spotted this right wing crap this week. but apparently it's been going on for a while.
http://sync.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1187&pid=5199
Just in case it gets deleted by the poster
clarice (809 posts)
68. Black Panthers at Philly election?.nt
This poster would also like to see more black leaders take a stronger stand on the Christopher Lane killing - http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3513390
Prayers - and rightfully so for Delbert Benton: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023519614
Thinks President Obama should comment on Benton Murder case maybe? Don't know - was wondering why he had not? http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3536551
Lighten up Mr. Scorpio - while pretty much laughing off as a joke that a kid got a bullet in his chest: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022677348
For your entertainment - search 'clarice trayvon' - I knew I remembered the interaction with mr scorpio - I pegged him/her with GreenStormCloud. Pages of one liners on that case.
Think we should alert MIRT? In one of those links he/she was pointed out as a troll. At minimum - ejected from this group?
This, especially, where she makes a joke about Trayvon Martin being killed, directed at Mr. Scorpio, should tell everyone here what you need to know about this person's intentions.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022677348#post3
Somehow I don't find it surprising that someone who is making racially grotesque comments here supports the racist religious faction aligned with the Republican Party. What's confusing is why she still posts here with impunity, or why anyone is defending her here.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
245 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Veerrry interesting stats on charitable contributions by State....I wouldn't have guessed it. [View all]
clarice
Jun 2014
OP
As the first comment notes: misleading in that it equates charitable giving with religious giving.
PeaceNikki
Jun 2014
#4
churches are for-profit entities using religion as the sales pitch and should be taxed nt
msongs
Jun 2014
#8
Exactly. Would be interested to see results with religious donations factored out. nt
stevenleser
Jun 2014
#19
I agree. Churches may do some charitable work, but much of the money they receive goes
Arkansas Granny
Jun 2014
#22
Agree with previous posters: When people are taught that part of being a good Christian is tithing,
Coventina
Jun 2014
#10
This includes forced contributions to religion and contributions to political social welfare groups?
Fred Sanders
Jun 2014
#11
How much of those "charitable contributions" goes to churches in conservative states?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2014
#17
more religious states donate more to charity. i haven't seen the map, but thats my guess
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#20
religious charities often come with strings attached. i am not against charity
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#24
and that texas is awesome. which is maybe in some respects but its a political nightmare zone
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#82
It is actually a very friendly place to live...neighbors helping neighbors...etc. nt
clarice
Jun 2014
#90
Why in the world would anyone do that? ........it's sneaky and untoward. IMHO. nt
clarice
Jun 2014
#112
Me too !!!!!! I lost partial hearing in one ear from a homemade firecracker!! nt
clarice
Jun 2014
#150
WTF is that even supposed to mean? Explain yourself. Did you read what I wrote?
PeaceNikki
Jun 2014
#33
Explain yourself. You made a shitty dig trying to offend me. Apologize or stand by it.
PeaceNikki
Jun 2014
#50
Well if I offended you....my sincerest apologies...is that a yes to the truce.......
clarice
Jun 2014
#122
Not trying to fight.....Are you against all donations from individuals/churches/ companies? nt
clarice
Jun 2014
#35
no, i just dont think that donations to religious institutions are anything to be glorified.
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#44
good for you. next time you post about an issue, you should try to be less uninformed about it. nt
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#55
And you my dear should learn common courtesy...That's ok...maybe you're just having a bad day. Peace
clarice
Jun 2014
#60
i'm having a great day and maybe if you were less of a passive aggressive poster you'd get
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#62
then maybe try to cut the passive aggressive shit. i am a new yorker and am fine with rudeness
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#78
i think you miss my point. there are millions of priyanka's. i have no idea who
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#141
I googled Priyanka and the first 5 posts, where pictures of a beautiful Bollywood actress. nt
clarice
Jun 2014
#142
maybe because they think not being glorified is the same as being attacked
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#226
Why would my post be considered RW stirring ? I said that I was surprised by results on the list.
clarice
Jun 2014
#32
well if it makes you feel better, then my other conclusion is that any one surprised
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#34
yes, women in general are prohibited from expressing that somethings should be pretty obvious
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#39
is conflating issues your strongest point? or do you have some other talent in debate?
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#53
well that was either a shitty debate team or you have lost your particular talent. nt
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#59
I think that you mis-understood. I'm all for women or anyone who has a different opinion than mine.
clarice
Jun 2014
#67
Were you also surprised by it last year when you posted the exact same link?
Bjorn Against
Jun 2014
#130
and all these du'ers who can't see through this BS. i don't know who is more laughable
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#228
None of that means a thing because they are giving to their own churches and political causes. When
jwirr
Jun 2014
#42
also, which states continuously vote in politicians who tax them at a higher rate
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#48
Exactly. Look at how the government treats the needy in their state and it will tell you a lot more
jwirr
Jun 2014
#70
Exactly. A 10% REQUIREMENT that's spent feeding and sheltering missionaries is not "charity"
arcane1
Jun 2014
#68
This site gives a breakdown (by region) that excludes religious contributions.
PotatoChip
Jun 2014
#74
If you want to discuss how the churches spend the contributions they receive....
MaggieD
Jun 2014
#129
I'm not at all surprised. The type of "charities" they are measuring are basically tax dodges where
corkhead
Jun 2014
#108
They are giving most of that money to their churches - very little of which probably
kestrel91316
Jun 2014
#148
I'm not sure what you mean,,,I'm not a Christian, nor do I have any affiliation. nt
clarice
Jun 2014
#153
My sincerest apologies....I miss- understood.....I' guess I've been attacked....
clarice
Jun 2014
#162
When you go to the Piggley Wiggley to buy a Yoo-Hoo, what do you pay with ? nt
clarice
Jun 2014
#176
Those statistics only hold for when people giving to their churches is included.
scarletwoman
Jun 2014
#171
It is a place where you send your money to make religious conmen very happy.
BlueStreak
Jun 2014
#194
Not being a church goer, I'm not sure of the percentages. I would love to see hard statistics....
clarice
Jun 2014
#184
Churches are not required to disclose how they spend their money (or even how much they get)
A Little Weird
Jun 2014
#195
When you exclude religious charities/churches, things look rather different. . .
Stargleamer
Jun 2014
#188
we understand this just fine. what we don't care much about is the extrapolation
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#227
And on the third day...she rested. Thanks for all of the feedback. Adios for now. nt
clarice
Jun 2014
#232