Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

mmonk

(52,589 posts)

7. This is good. I wrote in The News & Observer newspaper about the planned

Reply to suffragette (Original post)

Wed Dec 21, 2011, 06:42 AM

Dec 2011

merger and was blasted by readers because I said it would encourage or advance monopoly. They said I didn't know what a monopoly was. Everybody these days tells me I don't know what I'm talking about even though economics was one of my post secondary fields of study with political science being the other.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DOJ, anti-trust, AT&T and T-mobile [View all] suffragette Dec 2011 OP

This is a nice change. Laelth Dec 2011 #1

Good points suffragette Dec 2011 #2

Nice to see you too. Laelth Dec 2011 #3

kick for the evening suffragette Dec 2011 #4

So nice to see AT&T lose REP Dec 2011 #5

There is that, too :) suffragette Dec 2011 #6

This is good. I wrote in The News & Observer newspaper about the planned mmonk Dec 2011 #7

Well you were clearly correct suffragette Dec 2011 #8