Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)

1. Judge Anna Brown? It must be Oregon

Reply to Nye Bevan (Original post)

Tue Jun 24, 2014, 03:30 PM

Jun 2014

We'll see if this ruling stands up on appeal. I wonder if the Department of Justice will energetically contest the ruling or if it will shrug and say, "You know, the rights of our citizens come first. Fear-mongering and hyperbole really aren't any way to run the country."

Hey, it could happen! Or not.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Federal judge rules U.S. no-fly list violates Constitution [View all] Nye Bevan Jun 2014 OP

Judge Anna Brown? It must be Oregon gratuitous Jun 2014 #1

That's good news. The no-fly list is a crock. I've heard of innocent people including Louisiana1976 Jun 2014 #2

About time-- how many years has this been used to indiscriminately ruin people's livelihood & rights hlthe2b Jun 2014 #3

Excellent....there should be a way to maintain the list, but also reasonably challenge the msanthrope Jun 2014 #4

I say kill the list altogether - the fish stinks from the head down derby378 Jun 2014 #5