Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Map With Only 38 States [View all]

In 1973, California State University geography professor George Etzel Pearcy suggested that the U.S. redraw its antiquated state boundaries and narrow the overall number of states to 38.
Pearcy's proposed state lines were drawn in less-populated areas, isolating large cities and reducing their number within each state. He argued that if there were fewer cities vying for a state's tax dollars, more money would be available for projects that would benefit all citizens.
Because the current states were being chopped up beyond recognition, part of his plan included renaming the new states by referencing natural geologic features or the region's cultural history.
While he did have a rather staunch support networkeconomists, geographers, and even a few politicians argued that Pearcy's plan might be crazy enough to workthe proposal lost steam in Washington. Imagine all the work that would have to be done to enact Pearcy's plan: re-surveying the land, setting up new voter districts, new taxation infrastructurebasically starting the whole country over. It's easy to see why the government balked (though that doesn't mean it was a bad idea).
http://mentalfloss.com/article/57444/map-only-38-states
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ok - i get that they are named after geographical features - but Bitterroot? Superior?
el_bryanto
Jun 2014
#1
Also... he has 3 territories that border Lake Erie, but the Erie territory does not. *facepalm*
Takket
Jun 2014
#6
That state would be known as "Buckeye Nation" anyway. So it doesn't matter. (nt)
Jeff In Milwaukee
Jun 2014
#25
it doesn't seem to reduce the number of large cities within states at all
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2014
#12
i think the point was to reduce problems like chicago, which spills into indiana
unblock
Jun 2014
#16
Good question. And, as long as we're radically reconstructing the country, why not liberate them?
Coventina
Jun 2014
#38
Put this on the shelf for another 50ys until the climate change effects are better understood.
CK_John
Jun 2014
#28
Four Senators from North and South Dakota is ludicrous. Split California into 10 States, with 20
Fred Sanders
Jun 2014
#41