Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(36,392 posts)

15. It doesn't. The point of the OP is that teabaggers are not "good for Dems"

Wed Jun 25, 2014, 12:05 PM

Jun 2014

The posts that claim they are are dumb.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It should be noted DonCoquixote Jun 2014 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author HERVEPA Jun 2014 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author betterdemsonly Jun 2014 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author HERVEPA Jun 2014 #4

This message was self-deleted by its author betterdemsonly Jun 2014 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author HERVEPA Jun 2014 #7

This message was self-deleted by its author betterdemsonly Jun 2014 #8

This message was self-deleted by its author HERVEPA Jun 2014 #10

no shit. here's a clue folks: Doctor_J Jun 2014 #6

They think it is good for the Dem candidate betterdemsonly Jun 2014 #9

Obviously a divided GOP helps the Dems. HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #11

but it's not a competitive state. if Cochran loses there WILL BE A Doctor_J Jun 2014 #12

Yes, that was my point. HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #13

I fail to see what functional difference that makes. Warren Stupidity Jun 2014 #14

ah thanks, agree completely. Warren Stupidity Jun 2014 #16