Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We Cannot Allow This to Continue ... [View all]mike_c
(37,068 posts)21. here's another you might be interested in....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/maximizing-shareholder-value-the-goal-that-changed-corporate-america/2013/08/26/26e9ca8e-ed74-11e2-9008-61e94a7ea20d_story.html
I think it would be interesting to devote a thread to this topic.
Lynn Stout, a professor of corporate and business law at Cornell University Law School, traces the transformation to the rise of the Chicago school of free-market economists.
In 1970, Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman wrote an article in the New York Times Magazine in which he famously argued that the only social responsibility of business is to increase its profits.
Then in 1976, economists Michael Jensen and William Meckling published a paper saying that shareholders were principals who hired executives and board members as agents. In other words, when you are an executive or corporate director, you work for the shareholders.
In 1970, Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman wrote an article in the New York Times Magazine in which he famously argued that the only social responsibility of business is to increase its profits.
Then in 1976, economists Michael Jensen and William Meckling published a paper saying that shareholders were principals who hired executives and board members as agents. In other words, when you are an executive or corporate director, you work for the shareholders.
I think it would be interesting to devote a thread to this topic.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And as I am learning in another thread, Wall Street has convinced even some Dems
randys1
Jun 2014
#28
No, you're confusing private companies with public utilities in that other thread.
MADem
Jun 2014
#30
I've always maintained that US Government contracts should only be let to tax-paying corporations.
Richardo
Jun 2014
#3
When a corporation sells a product in the USA the corporation should be taxed...nt
pbmus
Jun 2014
#15
There are over 18 Million businesses in the US. Do that math. Yes if FUCKING MATTERS.
Lochloosa
Jun 2014
#26
The point is that the tax rate on some of those profits should be higher than 35%.
JDPriestly
Jun 2014
#31
If we repair the principle behind it, then you start pulling tax revenue from a LOT more than just
AtheistCrusader
Jun 2014
#32
.. and not to pile on (but i will)...GAO: U.S. corporations pay average effective tax rate of 12.6%
yodermon
Jun 2014
#34
Once again the root of this problem is not the Tax Code per se, it's the fact that these
Dustlawyer
Jun 2014
#22