Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: An example of how stupid we are and what we tolerate... [View all]randys1
(16,286 posts)34. Your disagreement makes sense, but when we nationalize everything you wont have
a concern.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
126 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The question is about the behavior of the 312 million chickens, and why, with so many, they
jtuck004
Jun 2014
#83
All of what you say is true, but it is also true that any area that doesn't now have reception
truedelphi
Jun 2014
#95
No, I didnt...actually it is a great example, given how EXTREMELY necessary it is
randys1
Jun 2014
#20
You pay taxes for roads, if you don't use the roads in any given month do you get your taxes back?
PoliticAverse
Jun 2014
#19
Yup, as frustrated as I get here i do know most people are decent and well meaning
randys1
Jun 2014
#61
Nah, you create not for profit entities and you do it with intelligent liberals
randys1
Jun 2014
#36
i think it's a fallacy that good people perform well and bad people perform poorly
geek tragedy
Jun 2014
#45
Huh? Nah, cons are assholes, liberals are not. A liberal can be an asshole in some
randys1
Jun 2014
#49
It doesnt require a greedy asshole to create a highly functional operation like a water system
randys1
Jun 2014
#52
that's where I am, and really for me it's a matter mostly of who does it better,
geek tragedy
Jun 2014
#68
"...And you knew who you werree thennn, goils were goils and men were men!"
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2014
#116
I included water and oil and fuel and internet access, if i didnt include water it was
randys1
Jun 2014
#30
I don't support nationalization of water, but water should be a local public resourse.
FSogol
Jun 2014
#89
I'm happy with my $7/month tracfone and don't want to be forced to subsidize people with iphones.
JVS
Jun 2014
#28
Your disagreement makes sense, but when we nationalize everything you wont have
randys1
Jun 2014
#34
Get a tracfone, use it for emergencies, and get off the phone as much as possible.
MADem
Jun 2014
#55
Well, I was paying the Japanese, the English, the Italians, everyone BUT the damn Americans!
MADem
Jun 2014
#108
It costs money to deliver water to a residence. Cities and towns have a "Water Department" for a
MADem
Jun 2014
#113
If you can't get your ass up and go to social services and get some assistance, or
MADem
Jun 2014
#120
Stop being obtuse--it's not cute, it makes you look like you're goading and baiting.
MADem
Jun 2014
#122
Cell phone service is the way it is because it is something close to a monopoly.
alarimer
Jun 2014
#69
Power and water should be provided by the state. Things like cell phone service, I'm not sure. n/t
nomorenomore08
Jun 2014
#79
That's why I suggested things like cell phone and cable TV service shouldn't be nationalized.
nomorenomore08
Jun 2014
#91
Me too. A life without frozen dairy treats wouldn't be much of a life, for me personally. n/t
nomorenomore08
Jun 2014
#93
you must live in a metropolitan area where more than one provider has excellent coverage
randys1
Jun 2014
#98
You can choose another company. Simple solution. No one forces you to use Verizon. n-t
Logical
Jun 2014
#106