Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)

3. No. Most bureaucrats, elected officials, and law enforcement people have no qualifications...

Reply to Snake Alchemist (Original post)

Wed Apr 4, 2012, 10:23 AM

Apr 2012

...to translate a diagnosis into an objective, rational decision affecting a person's civil rights.

Adjudications of mental incompetence, and information about involuntary commitments beyond whatever period law enforcement people can impose them (in California it's 72 hours per Welfare and Institutions Code Section 5150) should be available for background check purposes.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Should mental health diagnoses be available for federal firearm background checks? [View all] Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 OP

Sure, it's basically codes 290.0-319 cbdo2007 Apr 2012 #1

Virginia shooter had treatment. nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #2

Yes, but that treatment information wasn't available to the NICS system. TheWraith Apr 2012 #25

No. Most bureaucrats, elected officials, and law enforcement people have no qualifications... slackmaster Apr 2012 #3

Just devils advocate here, but #'s could be assigned. Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #5

All of those conditions come in wide ranges of severity and flavors slackmaster Apr 2012 #9

I suppose it would be up to the treating psychiatrist to enter and update the # code depending Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #12

That would cost the patient/applicant for a gun permit money slackmaster Apr 2012 #15

Very true. I wonder if single payer was ever implemented if it would make a difference. nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #17

Yet, any person with a history of clinical depression should still not be allowed to buy a gun. cbdo2007 Apr 2012 #14

What's the person's recourse for challenging a diagnosis? slackmaster Apr 2012 #16

So you want the other 49% to have easy access to guns?? cbdo2007 Apr 2012 #18

A number pulled out of your ass and an obvious straw man don't make good conversation starters slackmaster Apr 2012 #21

It would discourage people from getting needed mental health. former9thward Apr 2012 #4

What if it's just used to limit firearms for moderate to severe mental illness? nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #7

The problem is the definition of "moderate" or "severe" former9thward Apr 2012 #20

I suppose we would have to leave it to the mental health professionals. nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #22

Police are given a psychological fitness test before they are allowed to carry a gun NNN0LHI Apr 2012 #6

How often are these updated?? cbdo2007 Apr 2012 #10

the test given ensures that they are brutal and thuggish. provis99 Apr 2012 #28

They should be mandatory pscot Apr 2012 #8

I'm concerned about guitar man Apr 2012 #11

Really? You want your leaders making more laws against you? lisa caufield Apr 2012 #13

Interesting 5th post.... joeybee12 Apr 2012 #19

lol obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #27

Anyone can purchase a gun davidthegnome Apr 2012 #23

Nope, HIPPA and due process. X_Digger Apr 2012 #24

Yes obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #26