Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Massachusetts SWAT teams claim they’re private corporations, immune from open records laws [View all]
As part of the American Civil Liberties Unions recent report on police militarization, the Massachusetts chapter of the organization sent open records requests to SWAT teams across that state. It received an interesting response.
As it turns out, a number of SWAT teams in the Bay State are operated by what are called law enforcement councils, or LECs. These LECs are funded by several police agencies in a given geographic area and overseen by an executive board, which is usually made up of police chiefs from member police departments. In 2012, for example, the Tewksbury Police Department paid about $4,600 in annual membership dues to the North Eastern Massachusetts Law Enforcement Council, or NEMLEC. (See page 36 of linked PDF.) That LEC has about 50 member agencies. In addition to operating a regional SWAT team, the LECs also facilitate technology and information sharing and oversee other specialized units, such as crime scene investigators and computer crime specialists.
Some of these LECs have also apparently incorporated as 501(c)(3) organizations. And its here that we run into problems. According to the ACLU, the LECs are claiming that the 501(c)(3) status means that theyre private corporations, not government agencies. And therefore, they say theyre immune from open records requests. Lets be clear. These agencies oversee police activities. They employ cops who carry guns, wear badges, collect paychecks provided by taxpayers and have the power to detain, arrest, injure and kill. They operate SWAT teams, which conduct raids on private residences. And yet they say that because theyve incorporated, theyre immune to Massachusetts open records laws. The states residents arent permitted to know how often the SWAT teams are used, what theyre used for, what sort of training they get or who theyre primarily used against.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2014/06/26/massachusetts-swat-teams-claim-theyre-private-corporations-immune-from-open-records-laws/
As it turns out, a number of SWAT teams in the Bay State are operated by what are called law enforcement councils, or LECs. These LECs are funded by several police agencies in a given geographic area and overseen by an executive board, which is usually made up of police chiefs from member police departments. In 2012, for example, the Tewksbury Police Department paid about $4,600 in annual membership dues to the North Eastern Massachusetts Law Enforcement Council, or NEMLEC. (See page 36 of linked PDF.) That LEC has about 50 member agencies. In addition to operating a regional SWAT team, the LECs also facilitate technology and information sharing and oversee other specialized units, such as crime scene investigators and computer crime specialists.
Some of these LECs have also apparently incorporated as 501(c)(3) organizations. And its here that we run into problems. According to the ACLU, the LECs are claiming that the 501(c)(3) status means that theyre private corporations, not government agencies. And therefore, they say theyre immune from open records requests. Lets be clear. These agencies oversee police activities. They employ cops who carry guns, wear badges, collect paychecks provided by taxpayers and have the power to detain, arrest, injure and kill. They operate SWAT teams, which conduct raids on private residences. And yet they say that because theyve incorporated, theyre immune to Massachusetts open records laws. The states residents arent permitted to know how often the SWAT teams are used, what theyre used for, what sort of training they get or who theyre primarily used against.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2014/06/26/massachusetts-swat-teams-claim-theyre-private-corporations-immune-from-open-records-laws/
I'm sure it will be calmly explained that this is all for our own good and we're too inexperienced to comment let alone actually pursue an alternate course of action.
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Massachusetts SWAT teams claim they’re private corporations, immune from open records laws [View all]
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2014
OP
Except they aren't private. They're 100% taxpayer supported. They're rogues.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2014
#15
Still, I think calling them mercenaries to paint them in the worst possible light. If they want to
alfredo
Jun 2014
#37
I think it is best to call these SWAT teams mercenaries until there is full disclosure.
alfredo
Jun 2014
#36
These aren't private "security" firms. These are public employees that are 100% taxpayer support
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2014
#19
Not only would they repeal the 2nd they would employee these very same lawless paramilitary forces
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2014
#20
So a bunch of dudes with mini arsenals are going to take on a militarized police force?
BrotherIvan
Jun 2014
#38
The police are militarizing themselves against civilians, even innocent civilians.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2014
#47
I agree that cops should not be militarized as that would no longer serve their purpose
BrotherIvan
Jun 2014
#50
First, not "dudes", exclusively. Second, grab yerself a history book. Take VietNam, for example.
NYC_SKP
Jun 2014
#51
you go with that, the namecalling and broadbrushing, because beyond that you ain't got shit.
NYC_SKP
Jun 2014
#56
Every law enforcement official that went through the process of converting
LiberalFighter
Jun 2014
#21
Being Public Servants and payed by taxpayers, their resume(s), job application, and reviews
DhhD
Jun 2014
#22
Even if they are a private business, that argument is still BS. Any private corporation that works
DesertDiamond
Jun 2014
#32
Then they would complete their transition to warlord. They need to be stripped of their
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2014
#52