Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Since you asked. Why Elizabeth Warren? Why, since she too is "rich" and what is worse [View all]SheilaT
(23,156 posts)17. That's not quite what is being said.
Hillary's years in the Senate and term as Secretary of State following eight years in the White House have mainly served to insulate her from the 99%.
And as has already been pointed out: she was inevitable in 2008. So what happened?
She represents no new thinking, no new people, no real defense of average people.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Since you asked. Why Elizabeth Warren? Why, since she too is "rich" and what is worse [View all]
JDPriestly
Jun 2014
OP
Hillary's years in the Senate and her term as the Sec of State are meaningless according to...
Walk away
Jun 2014
#4
Elizabeth Warren left the GOP in the mid 90's, was GOP when Reagan was in office
Thinkingabout
Jun 2014
#5
Did you leave out a link? This thread doesn't have a post #35 yet. n/t
winter is coming
Jun 2014
#23
First, you are making assimptions. A president needs experience in many areas.
Thinkingabout
Jun 2014
#35
When I read Elizabeth Warren's book, I realized that she has been sort of "called"
JDPriestly
Jun 2014
#21
"Not haughty or arrogant or overly sure of herself." Is this for POTUS or Miss Congeniality?
McCamy Taylor
Jun 2014
#9
I don't want my President to have a Big Dick, I don't even care if my President
A Simple Game
Jun 2014
#14
The "average American" was pissed at Watergate and OK with the illegal Cambodian incursion.
McCamy Taylor
Jun 2014
#38
My view. That is why I am not concerned about Elizabeth Warren's relative lack of
JDPriestly
Jun 2014
#42
Her candidacy is way more important to America's future than Obama's or Hillary's ever were.
reformist2
Jun 2014
#39