General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Since you asked. Why Elizabeth Warren? Why, since she too is "rich" and what is worse [View all]Sissyk
(12,665 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Sun Jun 29, 2014, 11:07 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
"Not haughty or arrogant or overly sure of herself." Is this for POTUS or Miss Congeniality?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5168305
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Sexist comments are OK now if they're "figuratively" made? Come on.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Jun 29, 2014, 11:13 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I think the person who alerted on this is misunderstanding the commenters intent.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No, I agree. Sexist comment is sexist comment. Hide.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Sad. Can do better.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Cannot reply to automated messages
Alert abuse Delete this DU Mail