Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

SidDithers

(44,333 posts)

20. DU rec. Fuck the "not a dime's worth of difference" types...nt

Reply to lostincalifornia (Original post)

Mon Jun 30, 2014, 12:03 PM

Jun 2014

Sid

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] lostincalifornia Jun 2014 OP

Why do Democrats confirm RW justices? leftstreet Jun 2014 #1

You are absolutely right. However, it is far better to have someone in their who appoints lostincalifornia Jun 2014 #5

the same reason the GOP confirms left wing ones dsc Jun 2014 #16

That's true. There's also a difference between progressive Democrats and wall street Democrats. el_bryanto Jun 2014 #2

To whom, exactly, are you talking? nt ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2014 #3

You. This is all your fault. Renew Deal Jun 2014 #6

I am simply making a comment, not specifically directed at anyone personally. There is a difference lostincalifornia Jun 2014 #7

My guess would be to those who have not accepted Hillary as THE candidate, as yet. djean111 Jun 2014 #11

I don't think so sharp_stick Jun 2014 #13

Maybe the 100+ people who recced this OP, for starters... DanTex Jun 2014 #25

We are assuming a Wall Street-financed Dem president will appoint a liberal judge. djean111 Jun 2014 #4

He already appointed two. Renew Deal Jun 2014 #8

Yes, and those two voted with the progressives on this lostincalifornia Jun 2014 #12

As far as women's rights are concerned compared to a republican they sure will lostincalifornia Jun 2014 #10

But Ralph Nader said Gore and Bush are the same! Democat Jun 2014 #9

A better question would be: why couldn't Al Gore convince people that winter is coming Jun 2014 #19

Yes, Gore was in such control of the media that they criticized him jeff47 Jun 2014 #21

Given all the millions the Democratic Party had to spend, they should have been able to do winter is coming Jun 2014 #22

Oh bullshit. jeff47 Jun 2014 #23

So people who spread lies get a pass if the other side doesn't do the best possible refutation? Jim Lane Jun 2014 #24

I didn't claim that people who spread lies get a free pass. winter is coming Jun 2014 #26

NO ONE's actions exist in a vacuum. Jim Lane Jun 2014 #28

And yet, Nader's the one who gets the blame primarily (and sometimes solely), winter is coming Jun 2014 #29

DUers criticize Nader because, here, criticizing SCOTUS or Harris is preaching to the choir. Jim Lane Jun 2014 #30

On a day when the SC has yet again handed down an awful decision, winter is coming Jun 2014 #31

Your cheerful assumption is contradicted by the data. Jim Lane Jun 2014 #32

Sotomayor and Kagan DonCoquixote Jun 2014 #14

absolutely lostincalifornia Jun 2014 #15

Is this whining about the DU? Nt Logical Jun 2014 #17

Nope, it isn't. It's more an observation about political realities. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2014 #18

DU rec. Fuck the "not a dime's worth of difference" types...nt SidDithers Jun 2014 #20

that is what i keep saying randys1 Jun 2014 #27