Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think so boston JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #1
Me, too. Am I ever disgusted. Louisiana1976 Jun 2014 #26
Catholic school grad here HockeyMom Jun 2014 #2
I learnt the same at a private catholic school BootinUp Jun 2014 #3
Because those women can buy birth control on their own? quinnox Jun 2014 #4
Really you don't? Go read Ginsburg's dissenting opinion on the matter. boston bean Jun 2014 #7
They are already paying for insurance coverage Bettie Jun 2014 #8
I believe this entails all contraception. IUD's, the pill, plan b, the patch, shots, injections. boston bean Jun 2014 #12
And it should all be covered Bettie Jun 2014 #16
I figured you understood. But I believe some might not think it all the way through. boston bean Jun 2014 #17
And yet Viagra is still covered for men...[n/t] Maedhros Jun 2014 #34
So if the road only leads to their church you can build your own road to go elsewhere!!! Tikki Jun 2014 #9
Will you say the same when you have to pay for essential medication? BrotherIvan Jun 2014 #13
Hobby Lobby would rather its female employees be barefoot and pregnant. Louisiana1976 Jun 2014 #28
Which is funny because they probably don't want to pay for maternity leave BrotherIvan Jun 2014 #39
How would you feel if they were allowed to exclude pregnancy coverage for single women? Gormy Cuss Jun 2014 #15
True. You give them an inch, they'll want a mile. Louisiana1976 Jun 2014 #29
Hope you never work for Jehovah's Witnesses and need blood transfusion coverage. Starry Messenger Jun 2014 #19
Hmm, then I wouldn't work for jehovah's witnesses then quinnox Jun 2014 #20
No, they aren't. Starry Messenger Jun 2014 #21
In theory, yes. In practice - not always. REP Jun 2014 #22
Maybe women of the same religious beliefs need apply for work? lunatica Jun 2014 #35
Fundie Christians are deliberately moving the goalpost. Anansi1171 Jun 2014 #5
Exactly. Louisiana1976 Jun 2014 #31
There can be no freedom of religion with freedom from religion other than no one can make you have TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #6
Yeah, but that was then. MoonRiver Jun 2014 #10
It's all about which religion jeff47 Jun 2014 #11
Hobby Lobby is not a religious institution. It's an employer and should be held to the law. Gormy Cuss Jun 2014 #14
Right. The Activist Justices fucked over America today. nt valerief Jun 2014 #25
It's a pity at least one of these right-wing justices can't be impeached and then Louisiana1976 Jun 2014 #32
Impeached. That's just a few letters away from impaled, isn't it. valerief Jun 2014 #37
I don't see this as them pipi_k Jun 2014 #18
No, the religious belief of NO contraception, boston bean Jun 2014 #23
That was then... joeybee12 Jun 2014 #24
Having attended a religious school that gave the same lip service, LadyHawkAZ Jun 2014 #27
According to the opposition, yep, you had it wrong. malthaussen Jun 2014 #30
Because the Catholic Church says so Bickle Jun 2014 #33
Ronald Reagon is still killing us maindawg Jun 2014 #36
I guess I had the same bad teachers that you did............ wandy Jun 2014 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maybe they taught me wron...»Reply #28