Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This "Nader" talking point is convenient [View all]Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)42. I'd say Gore was probably doing what he thought was in the country's best interest.
Same as Nixon in 1960 (who was privately encouraged by several people, including Eisenhower, to refuse to concede and demand investigation of widespread voting irregularities that, if he'd done it, might have won him the presidency).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
124 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nader may not have been the biggest issue but the whole mess went on for 5 weeks.
Gidney N Cloyd
Jun 2014
#2
Heck, I'd go back even further: it never should've been that close a race to begin with.
arcane1
Jun 2014
#3
Don't want to get into a pissing contest, but there were enough enough votes that Ralph got that
lostincalifornia
Jun 2014
#5
No Ralph didn't get enough votes to make a difference, can't you Nader haters understand,
A Simple Game
Jun 2014
#91
Sorry, but the closeness of the election in Florida was influenced by Nader, and helped provide
lostincalifornia
Jun 2014
#95
There are close elections all the time, that too is a fact. Why do you and others
A Simple Game
Jul 2014
#112
Correct analysis, Nader deserves as much credibility today as Joe Lieberman, "none".
gordianot
Jun 2014
#10
'Fraid I have to agree. Gore was pressured to stop fighting after they started painting him
calimary
Jun 2014
#27
Sorry Aerows, you are way off on this one. Nader screwed up the election by providing cover.
greatlaurel
Jun 2014
#7
Al Gore wasn't prepared for a legal battle in the state where George Bush's brother was governor.
MohRokTah
Jun 2014
#9
I actually think it is a really elegant demonstration of what is wrong with the US.
Bonobo
Jun 2014
#38
In the context of most Nader disputes, I should be glad that "oddities" is such mild criticism. :)
Jim Lane
Jul 2014
#110
I was in Florida too. There was no way to compel Republican Gov and State Legislature to count votes
stevenleser
Jun 2014
#14
Their disgusting behavior is responsible for my level of political activity today.
stevenleser
Jun 2014
#19
Your comment about the relationship between points 2 and 3 is well-taken.
RufusTFirefly
Jun 2014
#54
Even in the 90s I thought Al Gore was much more progressive than his limited role as Vice-President
Uncle Joe
Jun 2014
#74
Once again, although I categorically reject your blaming of Nader, we agree.
RufusTFirefly
Jun 2014
#80
I view the coup of 2000 as a perfect storm of events arrayed against Al Gore.
Uncle Joe
Jun 2014
#94
Gore wasn't "entitled" as in getting a social security check, but from a logical point of view,
Uncle Joe
Jun 2014
#101
"To be honest I still don't believe we have come out of or recovered from the coup of 2000."
RufusTFirefly
Jun 2014
#102
I agree but the difference being neither one of them ran against the Democratic Party.
Uncle Joe
Jun 2014
#105
Yes and Abraham Lincoln chose Andrew Johnson as his Vice-President in his second term,
Uncle Joe
Jun 2014
#52
Dont forget the butterfly ballot resulting in thousands of votes for Pat buchanan in a place where
randys1
Jun 2014
#32
Awaiting a boilerplate response to your post that pushes the "electable" meme
RufusTFirefly
Jun 2014
#50
Gore lost because Gore failed to convince enough voters to vote for him.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2014
#40
Even if Gore had a million more votes in Florida than Bush, the electors would have gone with Bush.
alfredo
Jun 2014
#64
I'd say Gore was probably doing what he thought was in the country's best interest.
Spider Jerusalem
Jun 2014
#42
I hear ya. My bright-eyed, bushy-tailed "Let's put on a show" days are waning.
RufusTFirefly
Jul 2014
#121
I'm from the south so I have mixed feelings about what the Democrats used to be. I much prefer
alfredo
Jul 2014
#122
Gore was actually overtaking Bush until the faxed in "military votes" started coming in.
yellowcanine
Jul 2014
#116
Why beat a 5 year old dead horse when we can beat a 14 year old dead horse!
IronLionZion
Jul 2014
#117
Nader played by the rules, Gore played by the rules. Bush et al. did not. Let's
yellowcanine
Jul 2014
#119