Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: *ahem* [View all]Skittles
(157,088 posts)65. no
very intentionally they can seek sperm donors
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's not about abortion or contraception, it's about naughty ladies being punished for having sex.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2014
#3
Wait, no male and female sex? LGBTQ for everyone? Okay, I'm in. (Well not just yet!)
genwah
Jun 2014
#54
Yeah, but maybe that's what they really want. More dead or desperate women. nt
valerief
Jun 2014
#10
Guess what their response will be? Stop having sex. Sex is for procreation ONLY!!
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jun 2014
#20
People will stop having sex when SCOTUS stops having massive buffer zones for themselves. nt
valerief
Jun 2014
#25
Even simpler test - ask them where in the Constitution a religious test is required for office.
Initech
Jun 2014
#39
So if women working for Hobby Lobby get pregnant, does Hobby Lobby pay enough for them to
tclambert
Jun 2014
#47
Sorry, Will, but it means even more children growing up in poverty. Think about
madinmaryland
Jun 2014
#55