Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Automatic" 401K enrollment & deductions [View all]quakerboy
(14,857 posts)24. Actually, It really can
Its established that this is a short term job.
So they take the money, put it into this fund. In a short while the job is no more, and there surely will not be enough accumulated cash to sustain the investment. So they will forcibly cash it out, with penalties.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
no - the account can be rolled-over to an IRA - with another financial institution if
DrDan
Jul 2014
#31
Since the job isn't supposed to last long, I would definitely question being "automatically enrolled
MiniMe
Jul 2014
#14
So....the difference between $100 and $97 is a deal breaker for you? Is that it?
A HERETIC I AM
Jul 2014
#50
Everything you say is true; however, on principle I would argue against compulsory association.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
#33
employer contributions may or may not be "yours" based on the vesting requirments
DrDan
Jul 2014
#34
Indeed, the US Department of Labor even encourages automatic enrollment plans...
PoliticAverse
Jul 2014
#26
Automatic enrollment isn't designed to benefit people who aren't saving for retirement.
Gormy Cuss
Jul 2014
#47
Yes many companies do that, but a lot of companies do not. They should NOT automatically enroll you
lostincalifornia
Jul 2014
#52
apparently there is no match, per posts above, however, there are still tax advantages
DrDan
Jul 2014
#35
A lot of companies do that, and it is not right. I am surprised that practice is legal. Yes, you
lostincalifornia
Jul 2014
#51
Actually, the reason they do "Automatic" nowadays is because a lot of people that could benefit from
Xyzse
Jul 2014
#62
Translation: Saving for retirement sucks because I need to buy some Big Gulps and Chalupas today.
FSogol
Jul 2014
#63
No, translation: thirty dollars a paycheck buys me gas for my old car and some groceries
BuelahWitch
Jul 2014
#72