Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
33. Everything you say is true; however, on principle I would argue against compulsory association.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:18 AM
Jul 2014

Yes, it's easy to disassociate but why should anyone have to exert any effort to not be a apart of something they never wanted to be a part of in the first place. One could just as easily argue its no great burden for the company to ask first.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Ooh, they might invest in things you object to on religious grounds. MohRokTah Jun 2014 #1
Hm, that's an idea BuelahWitch Jun 2014 #2
"Most of all I object to them taking money out of my check" - TBF Jul 2014 #43
I think it's more like paying your Wall Street dues. n/t mattclearing Jul 2014 #27
Or, like every Fidelity account, they don't invest in anything... brooklynite Jul 2014 #80
Before you do that Demobrat Jun 2014 #3
Nope, no match BuelahWitch Jun 2014 #4
Well it still can't hurt to save for retirement when you have the chance. Demobrat Jun 2014 #5
Actually, It really can quakerboy Jul 2014 #24
or you roll it over into an IRA Travis_0004 Jul 2014 #29
no - the account can be rolled-over to an IRA - with another financial institution if DrDan Jul 2014 #31
And it stays tax sheltered when you roll it over into an IRA eallen Jul 2014 #64
Lots of companies have moved to passive enrollment abbeyco Jul 2014 #6
My husband started with a new company LibDemAlways Jul 2014 #7
I know they passed the law back in 2006 BuelahWitch Jul 2014 #8
Oh, for crying out loud A HERETIC I AM Jul 2014 #11
Since the job isn't supposed to last long, I would definitely question being "automatically enrolled MiniMe Jul 2014 #14
401(k)'s are portable. A HERETIC I AM Jul 2014 #15
Painless for you, maybe BuelahWitch Jul 2014 #21
So....the difference between $100 and $97 is a deal breaker for you? Is that it? A HERETIC I AM Jul 2014 #50
So you worked for the Wall Street Casino? BuelahWitch Jul 2014 #58
See? Right there. That bullshit response is exactly what I expected. A HERETIC I AM Jul 2014 #61
I give back what I get BuelahWitch Jul 2014 #73
Everything you say is true; however, on principle I would argue against compulsory association. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2014 #33
As Skittles said in post #19 below.... A HERETIC I AM Jul 2014 #54
It's hard to argue with you when everything you say is true. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2014 #60
You have to opt out of many things Lurker Deluxe Jul 2014 #66
Are you sure about that? quakerboy Jul 2014 #25
her contributions are 100 hers Travis_0004 Jul 2014 #30
employer contributions may or may not be "yours" based on the vesting requirments DrDan Jul 2014 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author A HERETIC I AM Jul 2014 #37
oops - meant employer contributions - will change it DrDan Jul 2014 #39
Fair enough. n/t A HERETIC I AM Jul 2014 #40
Yes I am quite sure. A HERETIC I AM Jul 2014 #38
Most people go with the default option mythology Jul 2014 #9
401k vadermike Jul 2014 #10
I understand that. I would still like to make my own decision BuelahWitch Jul 2014 #12
No one shoud be put in the position of having LibDemAlways Jul 2014 #13
No, it's not. A HERETIC I AM Jul 2014 #16
I stand corrected. I have nothing against LibDemAlways Jul 2014 #17
they tried that and it did not work Skittles Jul 2014 #19
Indeed, the US Department of Labor even encourages automatic enrollment plans... PoliticAverse Jul 2014 #26
they could be taking cues from Australia Skittles Jul 2014 #28
Automatic enrollment isn't designed to benefit people who aren't saving for retirement. Gormy Cuss Jul 2014 #47
I'm not an idiot Skittles Jul 2014 #69
I don't believe that I called you an idiot. Gormy Cuss Jul 2014 #70
Thank you! n/t BuelahWitch Jul 2014 #74
BuelahWitch, find out what the company match is Skittles Jul 2014 #18
There is no company match BuelahWitch Jul 2014 #20
why all the outrage? This is not uncommon - simply opt-out. DrDan Jul 2014 #22
This is DU, it runs on outrage n/t BuelahWitch Jul 2014 #42
well . . . you have a good point there DrDan Jul 2014 #53
Yes many companies do that, but a lot of companies do not. They should NOT automatically enroll you lostincalifornia Jul 2014 #52
I really have no problem with it . . . DrDan Jul 2014 #56
I was surprised it was legal too BuelahWitch Jul 2014 #57
My employer madville Jul 2014 #23
5% is a nice match. badtoworse Jul 2014 #46
The match was put tree when the pension was reduced madville Jul 2014 #65
Is there an employer match? Don't opt out until you know. badtoworse Jul 2014 #32
apparently there is no match, per posts above, however, there are still tax advantages DrDan Jul 2014 #35
You don't need to sell me on 401k's. I'm a big believer badtoworse Jul 2014 #44
You have to sign a statement officially opting out HockeyMom Jul 2014 #36
Never had to do this BuelahWitch Jul 2014 #41
Just out curiosity, how are you set up for retirement? badtoworse Jul 2014 #45
I know how much this sucks tech3149 Jul 2014 #48
Yeah, too bad you don't have a pension (lol) cbdo2007 Jul 2014 #49
Actually I do have a pension BuelahWitch Jul 2014 #59
Hope it remains fully funded Lurker Deluxe Jul 2014 #67
Frankly, I don't know that I'll live to see any of it BuelahWitch Jul 2014 #75
A lot of companies do that, and it is not right. I am surprised that practice is legal. Yes, you lostincalifornia Jul 2014 #51
I did, first thing this morning. BuelahWitch Jul 2014 #55
Actually, the reason they do "Automatic" nowadays is because a lot of people that could benefit from Xyzse Jul 2014 #62
Translation: Saving for retirement sucks because I need to buy some Big Gulps and Chalupas today. FSogol Jul 2014 #63
No, translation: thirty dollars a paycheck buys me gas for my old car and some groceries BuelahWitch Jul 2014 #72
$30 a paycheck just might save your ass when you get old. It also reduces your tax burden. FSogol Jul 2014 #76
Apples and oranges BuelahWitch Jul 2014 #78
Agree. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jul 2014 #77
been there. at my call center job, I had to opt out of an automatic 401k magical thyme Jul 2014 #68
That's terrible BuelahWitch Jul 2014 #71
Thanks to those who were nice to me even if you disagreed with my post BuelahWitch Jul 2014 #79
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Automatic" 401...»Reply #33