Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Thanks, Nader. [View all]hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)9. Sorry but if Nader did not ru. Gore would not have needed to spend as much time in NM, WI, OR, and
IA. The campaign would have unfolded differently if Nader did not run. Gore would have gotten enough votes in NH and FL that they would not have been able to steal it.
Yes the court stole it for him but Nader was a contributing factor.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Indeed! Nader has his share of the blame. Not all becuse Gore's campaign was horrible and the gop
hrmjustin
Jul 2014
#1
Sorry but if Nader did not ru. Gore would not have needed to spend as much time in NM, WI, OR, and
hrmjustin
Jul 2014
#9
Exit polls showed some would have voted. More said they would have voted for gore.
hrmjustin
Jul 2014
#27
Lets all huddle for warmth around the official 35 posters who spew it on demand!
bobduca
Jul 2014
#22
That's certainly not true. If Gore had decided not to run, some other Democrat would have.
Jim Lane
Jul 2014
#38
Would Gore have won if he turned further right to capture more "moderates"?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2014
#44
When people have a perfectly good opportunity to slam Republicans and instead they excuse them
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2014
#45